From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7DB4D8D8A for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784646107; cv=none; b=DbZV6QGAEgBZrrz684/PreZ7JNOJCcnwXUCbAz+YO2RT+xTUrpetcXoDwf5Hm098fpkn0Eoj3TETs5mNrPduX3x7jKCU0UAwWf8ifATg67XN013rIi1uR/Q2a77cAP2d9axJlvzZWQCCm1LS7U1g57QQGu7GG7iT/deSvLhxupk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784646107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yDHYzQ4c4JLDFAYdyT0FAPgNawRpXhXvPfO9plAB95o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=E7QWhPg+XH2a6jvnbCDOpEDGlZlH46e/S6pbIS+S09pUf5hKm0hSHNw7RDxoupE+W1XChSquRYQ8FnQqz8ntEy+57j/pzAPZxHtwnbNpdwIAPPXPcCHFxrYoPsj+7gCbMSBgRlKSKlFKZZMBY4hU6MvegSSDv43Msi7hnn0KJXc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6DA6768D1F; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:01:42 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Carlos Maiolino Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, dgc@kernel.org Subject: Re: improve log context annotations Message-ID: <20260721150142.GA14984@lst.de> References: <20260720094609.2191633-1-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:16:40AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > Thanks. Those all look good for me. But I'm adding Dave to the thread as > he has much more expertise with lockdep than me and I'd appreciate his > input. More review is always good. But as a reminder for the audience: lockdep and the lock context annotations are two totally seaprate things. The former verifies the locking state at runtime, while the latter is about compile-time enforcement for the cases where that is possible.