From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6924EA378; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:29:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784647781; cv=none; b=EJE1984Nxgki608ztSdwAX//zZlkEKF0rPrDd357XxxXano4uISN61vC1Ja4YQC7mSC6NYf7oim3VB5xXhwzN6JTwY+IlLfAzd53CBYC+MpEVmDpnljE7c8Pu/3T3hi90kMdEDc/ZacbIlyN/UvbyeoIfBlQ55//luTeu/fr/VY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784647781; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e3tYm63ntmoGy56cDcBHb0JFWahZmesRKRve9A/owNs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=nUljro3OsGOn7+BT1ccSfI9MMura9ETs71n4H8WZIvGlSGpfmo3IZCbxCNwvV3as19Xov6NLSKut63ptc08NbpVE2IIXuxITIYqAp9wbW1ul7jWauduE3WJYEj9a462+EbIo4ed6k0K3Kl6cckbqjKlhRoVZTlN87fZruzqArX0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=d32jcYNT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="d32jcYNT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D4491F00A3A; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:29:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1784647779; bh=QzkhmFdcGcNsF+1U7lvnj3iIhS4g5wC/inMCzQa6cOU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=d32jcYNT5eUilrM0yDosEMlX3rRv6Y8FHqyeVGW3+NHut0sWUDkYhzC1wjsDV1Qz5 cswTI2qOsvs4QYQSAOaExRNRsPKUcZt161WTFqkEVF30vYe9Fp1gmVgOIS+7CfEIOa ExcCYKHcL2cYcPYKLL1OV3VZ861k71HMvcEB2/1k= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Daniel Borkmann , Puranjay Mohan , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.1 0002/1067] bpf, arm64: Reject out-of-range B.cond targets Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:10:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20260721152424.584138381@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 In-Reply-To: <20260721152424.521567757@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260721152424.521567757@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Daniel Borkmann [ Upstream commit 48d83d94930eb4db4c93d2de44838b9455cff626 ] aarch64_insn_gen_cond_branch_imm() calls label_imm_common() to compute a 19-bit signed byte offset for a conditional branch, but unlike its siblings aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm() and aarch64_insn_gen_comp_branch_imm(), it does not check whether label_imm_common() returned its out-of-range sentinel (range) before feeding the value to aarch64_insn_encode_immediate(). aarch64_insn_encode_immediate() unconditionally masks the value with the 19-bit field mask, so an offset that was rejected by label_imm_common() gets silently truncated. With the sentinel value SZ_1M, the resulting field ends up with bit 18 (the sign bit of the 19-bit signed displacement) set, and the CPU decodes it as a ~1 MiB *backward* branch, producing an incorrectly targeted B.cond instruction. For code-gen locations like the emit_bpf_tail_call() this function is the only barrier between an overflowing displacement and a silently miscompiled branch. Fix it by returning AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT when the offset is out of range, so callers see a loud failure instead of a silently misencoded branch. validate_code() scans the generated image for any AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT and then lets the JIT fail. Fixes: 345e0d35ecdd ("arm64: introduce aarch64_insn_gen_cond_branch_imm()") Fixes: c94ae4f7c5ec ("arm64: insn: remove BUG_ON from codegen") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260415121403.639619-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arm64/lib/insn.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c index 44bb90ee2f414b..a50f6c061c27a2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c @@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ u32 aarch64_insn_gen_cond_branch_imm(unsigned long pc, unsigned long addr, long offset; offset = label_imm_common(pc, addr, SZ_1M); + if (offset >= SZ_1M) + return AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT; insn = aarch64_insn_get_bcond_value(); -- 2.53.0