From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E4147044B; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784662849; cv=none; b=jrJDCi8S53B2+WKFNKmSyJBg/EFqzggUUh0j2IRNpQpgU+5R0rFsT5adW74ISvm/htmWeujQZcj33LfNxWgltYO8oGT8vpTbReEmpxvc7f7Gk+T485QkKNcEhpJMRoalUClgFEg0Y5V30Mnh2/xZFmDV4e0ZUt6qDHPRcQJEBgI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784662849; c=relaxed/simple; bh=txIyyi+WnG83wh7s6vgO18boxhkNs+hazgZL0dXaPbA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dsG2TiRvG4fpBOY41BQ0Av97IwcN167T1pkMmWiOIi3qWxvMgDKh/sAJyvfpDpIJIisO8KD/42nBM5dgtjN45TFWhrraOuV/TFN00pOZr6EU77kCgl5oN/O3jh0IiEgBmrSTRsdtoNgi2ec37OzyyvWg0n9DluXO4j/4lsLDgvs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=MrXDP7hR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="MrXDP7hR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D941F1F00A3A; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:40:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1784662848; bh=ZDaS2dUS5slCDfiDjCHv7slr3yYXt4vZsvfQrUu/lyc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=MrXDP7hRCYtEAVZZSiMza4M3j0WXvCImti4fUDTrv3gdVHMYsK96nknbGE+S8MNuS eYn+ToY8KM+xIE7bhGeoVOm70Ookvmu+0XLTDCcs3cSI3FjHSuzsSH5g53umogXqLO 9KUs0op/ZS+ZbntRm5t7B4+UkjMczeIAWwLuGUGw= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, sashiko-bot , Dave Marchevsky , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.12 0557/1276] perf bpf: Bounds-check array offsets in bpil_offs_to_addr() Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:16:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20260721152458.582389720@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0 In-Reply-To: <20260721152446.065700225@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260721152446.065700225@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [ Upstream commit 033e85edfbf271f92979d2a39aeaf40f8472a795 ] bpil_offs_to_addr() converts offsets stored in perf.data's bpf_prog_info_linear structure into heap pointers by adding the offset to the data allocation base. The offsets come from untrusted file input and are not validated against data_len. If an offset exceeds data_len, the computed address points outside the allocated data buffer. Callers like synthesize_bpf_prog_name() then dereference prog_tags[sub_id] or func_info pointers, reading arbitrary heap memory. Add a bounds check: when an offset exceeds data_len, zero the field and skip the conversion. This prevents out-of-bounds pointer construction from crafted perf.data files. Reported-by: sashiko-bot Fixes: 6ac22d036f86c4e2 ("perf bpf: Pull in bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear()") Cc: Dave Marchevsky Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6 Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c index 5a66dc8594aa88..03a621a0c5dcd5 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-utils.c @@ -264,12 +264,28 @@ void bpil_offs_to_addr(struct perf_bpil *info_linear) for (i = PERF_BPIL_FIRST_ARRAY; i < PERF_BPIL_LAST_ARRAY; ++i) { const struct bpil_array_desc *desc = &bpil_array_desc[i]; __u64 addr, offs; + __u32 count, size; if ((info_linear->arrays & (1UL << i)) == 0) continue; offs = bpf_prog_info_read_offset_u64(&info_linear->info, desc->array_offset); + count = bpf_prog_info_read_offset_u32(&info_linear->info, + desc->count_offset); + size = bpf_prog_info_read_offset_u32(&info_linear->info, + desc->size_offset); + /* offset and extent from perf.data are untrusted — keep within data[] */ + if (offs >= info_linear->data_len || + (u64)count * size > info_linear->data_len - offs) { + bpf_prog_info_set_offset_u64(&info_linear->info, + desc->array_offset, 0); + bpf_prog_info_set_offset_u32(&info_linear->info, + desc->count_offset, 0); + /* clear the bit so bpil_addr_to_offs() won't reverse a zeroed address */ + info_linear->arrays &= ~(1UL << i); + continue; + } addr = offs + ptr_to_u64(info_linear->data); bpf_prog_info_set_offset_u64(&info_linear->info, desc->array_offset, addr); -- 2.53.0