From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3620F39768C; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784672924; cv=none; b=ZB9LzRElXre3n6/z6JdOFY4WqkUVWbpCgGzDQ3LLERw6YZhkIfbNqBp02GUQdscUbzVOaBCwKc1DFcepjvElNYMwjuvNKRsGWiW0jhiEmQXj4aM8YiI4YmQqnWxLjen/+o1Ee0QeLGxli7tsLbMjbMb0mWlRGDqA89WUCKQcTyA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784672924; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8ZPMmpE9Yd8t2kSj5AVGIzDNSzCMoGFqHFEgTg6GC5w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=msiGv5tMSplT/1h3ArgCiEwG8zBP40QqCbgk6x9SqDQNPSx5EyKQ1m1gBpsiyZdqQtbfIEij12FKngpTV8VgcER7WOvF+ZxRQaDEEkZ5rcQXvDo/5KSnn8A9uL7EELSnajUaceDEGJcHuUCIEcGXGI89d7FOU8f6Xozt/SuY/YE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N/GZ3eAC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N/GZ3eAC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFFF81F00A3A; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:28:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784672921; bh=JM6u5NbwgOPdzr18zeF4SF12g7wrQy7/ZLOT7oLfNCs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=N/GZ3eACViPk+M4Sm11CgBv5p7GmHju5I8SklR8OL/n48xS5guVpUm8YYbFY6779H UaEk2tG1h18//4NaAM/FUzD0slJF6/y7zkQ73dinn7m8LjuwMrspPtuBbRygYEOnRC US+rInvatvUtmrpYOyrfI0SAvMm+YrANPMt5mQ6CJuvFr6oNK6BdJdusk46Uv81rj/ fw+FSaafX0O+iVZeA7QZ/Q3GPN4rIFKbi2jlY9K7dacwGZgyfPGNxlnlOkw6hDJxQL 0eAcI9TOT3tbRnrqvnyOXYIoh34zaHBRxqcs0g4PdoIM7iNuldEuZJif5dgMBWx+F+ IrW2Uw8hlW2SA== Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:28:40 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Howells Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marc Dionne , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 00/14] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling Message-ID: <20260721152840.407c0a7d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260713081022.2186481-1-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20260713081022.2186481-1-dhowells@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:10:06 +0100 David Howells wrote: > fs/afs/cm_security.c | 311 +++++++++++++--------------- > fs/afs/cmservice.c | 33 +-- > fs/afs/file.c | 12 +- > fs/afs/fs_operation.c | 2 +- > fs/afs/fs_probe.c | 5 + > fs/afs/fsclient.c | 7 +- > fs/afs/internal.h | 63 +++--- > fs/afs/main.c | 1 - > fs/afs/rxrpc.c | 137 +++++-------- > fs/afs/server.c | 2 +- > fs/afs/vl_probe.c | 2 +- > fs/afs/vlclient.c | 8 +- Why are we getting fs/ patches? We have enough bugs routed thru net as is, can you please find some other way to get these to Linus if they don't depend on net/ changes?