From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B663C4451C for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wmDuf-0004pG-9F; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:05:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wmDuZ-0004nq-8m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:05:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wmDuX-00074N-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:05:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1784653540; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IFRZLrP2Tsi31KJpqkQBmNqY7C+CroUhXMG17npnqxg=; b=H7pOfzX7JJ0Nsn1iyVBpzKrRRxjL6TStsiwUvqfDGTVmy0oPrjTqHLLyBYiBe3a/Rj5Y0z 8ZT46aAW7xFXKtZeL57+4ViIlTmxmk4rGFab4CjVJQr/AFQcjCD1zFRX0PIxQ08ZnhZzwW roiKueYkIMyWBxm4ePDSJ5THxVj3eeg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-459-1zCln9wbN-64U-Fulv5zuQ-1; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:05:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1zCln9wbN-64U-Fulv5zuQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 1zCln9wbN-64U-Fulv5zuQ_1784653536 Received: from mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.95]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB651800625; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from corto.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.48.82]) by mx-prod-int-10.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F07159D; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:05:34 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Thanos Makatos , =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= Subject: [PULL 07/13] vfio-user: vfio_user_get_region_info: reject unreasonably short struct Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20260721170518.4160785-8-clg@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20260721170518.4160785-1-clg@redhat.com> References: <20260721170518.4160785-1-clg@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.6 on 10.30.177.95 Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=clg@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Thanos Makatos While this isn't technically a bug, it's highly unlikely that the server wouldn't be writing an entire struct. Signed-off-by: Thanos Makatos Fixes: 667866d66620 ("vfio-user: implement VFIO_USER_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO") Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20260721122643.30985-4-thanos.makatos@nutanix.com Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater --- hw/vfio-user/device.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/vfio-user/device.c b/hw/vfio-user/device.c index 8350bb2c018504dbca50a4e9afbfc6be251f5b2a..3d12e8b2a20eb96fb1a8a944070d13bf0e049b67 100644 --- a/hw/vfio-user/device.c +++ b/hw/vfio-user/device.c @@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static int vfio_user_get_region_info(VFIOUserProxy *proxy, } trace_vfio_user_get_region_info(msgp->index, msgp->flags, msgp->size); + if (msgp->argsz < sizeof(*info)) { + error_printf("vfio_user_get_region_info reply argsz too small\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + memcpy(info, &msgp->argsz, info->argsz); /* -- 2.55.0