From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848C5472F81 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784677466; cv=none; b=Im3yWd69omdtPKEoE/xJlR25pHXEcwX4zINwTpovS5r7mmbdXbrezVaruNoxKnvyfUtv+VY81heQVINCFZjK/GlSDSAtLJjB6B242+Ae1cmqLmVJSFrT3wL5xoE5nfS23z0ThFmnrHhgH4WoGrW/yj/vDIYf20R0r9Wza+W32+0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784677466; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9ke5ltpMyww31VXSxFjqz1I+HezOOV09TDv11cJPjG4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fgArpunvAcyEz+ZefXkC3gX6qd9LZV1j+Cb2qr8YP109geJX+QDtD0d3BWb3SxbLnhrHpMel4h6NidnW+7CgrZWApsuZq6eMWUhp547jN9c5/PVRJUafkadXr5nqZoiqKlY3+d+0KU4CI/l9aDfkP/LM+MdQZEnTL71gBd2kaqI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf10.hostedemail.com (lb01a-stub [10.200.18.249]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8810B80303; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B7AD732; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:44:15 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Jan Kara , Theodore Tso , Roman Gushchin , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Derek Barbosa , Matthieu Baerts , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Jason Gunthorpe , users@kernel.org, Linux Media Mailing List , Stephen Finucane Subject: Re: Linking Patchwork with Sashiko? Message-ID: <20260721194415.1b1729d7@robin> In-Reply-To: <20260721224328.GH536385@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> References: <20260713095538.3d5e86f1@foz.lan> <20260713094120.GD1127719@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260713220427.582b28bf@foz.lan> <7ia4mrvtrxjl.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <20260715005909.GF1656185@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260715161111.GC1778116@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260715202808.GN1778116@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <2vzlg72ohneu5djixzhoz4s4bharc5i7hzhe4wvhcx55ae3vx4@unh35s26hbiy> <20260721224328.GH536385@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: gyy9fk4sckxyi4t8qr3hjtnwrx5pu6pb X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B7AD732 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+p0pxa1B+D2dLgalffjacdvHfeRJUtbvY= X-HE-Tag: 1784677456-150218 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/lHoqIYjHsgU2lR7kZMDLd26HwLTzfB/k/Ol3n843/AMxBZTWZlrWKyMUmNQHWhfamSIOv9F9xpLRAnPoo0ydiY56KEUIjIxGvW59fHV6zKykw7MD4F3O3QRmOaInJF6pCZG2ezHRFe757Hk9shVD1DO1S3StRHIXPlq+29xynGDAm2oYrw60I/4ATqtpND2doeZZI+puziNsbrnWTNN0+gEeV29+hV0nG1ocgOrchFYyAqtU+1yfslai9xl4g/CW0aNj7tW50KvZjquaGObkQ49knMKcOWRSBnP9O92aSmLXAT6XCwQ3Lu2UZuUS96fPpqBYm9kqN47AX4rocPqbfl727EwkMiMl0KgZwFsTrI0F/XF2eC+5c On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:43:28 +0300 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > The other aspect, less related to how maintainers react to the reviews, > is also less related to sashiko in particular. I think there's a > fundamental difference between receiving feedback from "regular" static > analyzers compared to a machine that is made to express itself as a > human. The 0day bot doesn't feel like it's trying to trick me. I would > probably have different feelings if sashiko provided reviews in a more > "machine" language. Or it could just end the email with: "Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot." ;-) -- Steve