From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Xu Rao <raoxu@uniontech.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.12.y] ALSA: hda: Fix cached processing coefficient verbs
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:01:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722110122.1006393-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026072010-denial-election-d397@gregkh>
From: Xu Rao <raoxu@uniontech.com>
[ Upstream commit f67be28fdf8b5d31ac1cc1152bb17250f9f8f513 ]
Intel HD Audio defines Coefficient Index and Processing Coefficient as
separate audio widget controls in the Audio Widget Verb Definitions:
Coefficient Index selects the coefficient slot, while Processing
Coefficient accesses the value at the selected slot.
hda_reg_read_coef() selects the slot with AC_VERB_SET_COEF_INDEX, but
then uses AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX for the value read. That reads back the
selected index instead of the coefficient value. hda_reg_write_coef()
has the same issue and builds the value write from AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX
instead of AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF.
This only affects the regmap coefficient cache path used by codecs that
set codec->cache_coef. Direct coefficient helpers already use the normal
SET_COEF_INDEX followed by GET_PROC_COEF or SET_PROC_COEF sequence, which
is likely why this has not been noticed widely.
Use AC_VERB_GET_PROC_COEF for cached coefficient reads and
AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF for cached coefficient writes.
Fixes: 40ba66a702b8 ("ALSA: hda - Add cache support for COEF read/write")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Xu Rao <raoxu@uniontech.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/DB9023BF2920BA99+20260707132419.1731342-1-raoxu@uniontech.com
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c b/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
index 97cee096a2864f..1ebc6dcc66893f 100644
--- a/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
+++ b/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int hda_reg_read_coef(struct hdac_device *codec, unsigned int reg,
err = snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX << 8);
+ verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_GET_PROC_COEF << 8);
return snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, val);
}
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int hda_reg_write_coef(struct hdac_device *codec, unsigned int reg,
err = snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, NULL);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_GET_COEF_INDEX << 8) |
+ verb = (reg & ~0xfffff) | (AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF << 8) |
(val & 0xffff);
return snd_hdac_exec_verb(codec, verb, 0, NULL);
}
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 9:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ALSA: hda: Fix cached processing coefficient verbs" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-22 11:01 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722110122.1006393-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=raoxu@uniontech.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.