Re: [ANN] Mailing list migration to lists.u-boot-project.org

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1470 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 03:29:23PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2026, Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> > >  That's going to break patch submissions, isn't it?
> > 
> > Looks like it's working:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20260721063050.18756-1-dinesh.maniyam@altera.com/
> 
>  It breaks for `git am' though, such as for picking up patches directly 
> from the mailing list via the MUA (hmm, why hasn't this particular patch 
> arrive here?).  There are other issues with the rewrite, such as the 
> inability to sort messages by authors in the mailbox, but the former is 
> possibly the most painful.
> 
> > Not my favorite that it's going to have "... via U-Boot" in patchwork
> > only. And we already have "... via B4 Relay" in others. We aren't the
> > only project OSU OSL is hosting mailman for, so I'd assume this is a
> > solved problem.
> 
>  Yep, GNU toolchain lists I'm on that are used for patch distribution 
> (such as <binutils@sourceware,org>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, but not 
> <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>) simply disabled such rewriting, after numerous 
> discussions (not sure what OSU OSL is though).
> 
>  Up to you to decide, I just wanted to share my concern.

So, thank you both, Maciej and Mark for bringing this up. I relayed this
back to OSU OSL again and it was indeed really a misconfiguration on the
migration and not a policy that we had to keep. It's now been fixed.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]