All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Nam Cao" <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] af_unix: Schedule the garbage collector at task exit
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:31:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723093156.8CE571F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba4ed2717e5225b7b77ef928fb97ee5544632811.1784712370.git.namcao@linutronix.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditionally triggering the global AF_UNIX garbage collector on task exit creates a severe system-wide denial of service vulnerability.
- [Medium] A TOCTOU race on `gc_in_progress` causes `do_exit()` to skip queueing the garbage collector if it is currently running, leaving the cyclic sockets leaked indefinitely.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] af_unix: Schedule the garbage collector at task exit ---
commit 9a35b6370cf5aa7dba01e2ce8f06d95e2eb14265
Author: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>

af_unix: Schedule the garbage collector at task exit

This commit attempts to fix a memory leak involving dead cyclic reference
AF_UNIX sockets when a task exits. It does this by scheduling the garbage
collector during task exit, after the task's file descriptors have been
closed.

> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index 2c0b1c02920f4..593ac4b0105f2 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1009,6 +1010,12 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
>  	exit_task_work(tsk);
>  	exit_thread(tsk);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Must be after exit_files() and exit_task_work(tsk) to ensure that
> +	 * the task's AF_UNIX sockets have all been closed.
> +	 */
> +	unix_schedule_gc(NULL);

[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally triggering the global AF_UNIX garbage collector on task
exit create a severe system-wide denial of service vulnerability?

By passing NULL to unix_schedule_gc(), the rate-limiting check
(user->unix_inflight) is bypassed. If an unprivileged user creates a cyclic
graph of AF_UNIX sockets, every task exit system-wide would unconditionally
queue unix_gc_work.

The GC thread would then take the global unix_gc_lock spinlock and perform
an O(N) traversal of all cyclic sockets, burning CPU and blocking all
legitimate AF_UNIX operations system-wide.

[Severity: Medium]
Can a race on gc_in_progress cause do_exit() to skip queueing the garbage
collector if it is currently running, leaving the cyclic sockets leaked
indefinitely?

If a background GC run is currently active, gc_in_progress is true. If the
concurrent GC scans the exiting task's sockets before they are closed, it
considers them alive.

When the exiting task subsequently closes them and calls
unix_schedule_gc(NULL), it sees gc_in_progress is true and silently skips
queueing a new GC pass. This fails to reliably fix the socket leak it was
intended to resolve.

> +
>  	sched_autogroup_exit_task(tsk);
>  	cgroup_task_exit(tsk);
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1784712370.git.namcao@linutronix.de?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22  9:31 [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] af_unix: Fix priority inversion issue Nam Cao
2026-07-22  9:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] af_unix: Schedule the garbage collector at task exit Nam Cao
2026-07-23  9:31   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-22  9:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] af_unix: Do not wait for garbage collector in sendmsg() Nam Cao
2026-07-23  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22  9:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] af_unix: Clean up unix_schedule_gc() Nam Cao
2026-07-23  9:31   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260723093156.8CE571F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.