From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/8] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a channel program mutex
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:47:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723174751.1180334-8-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723174751.1180334-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
The channel_program struct is manipulated without a serialization
mechanism to ensure consistent behavior. Take a broad stroke of
putting the entire structure behind a mutex, and ensure everything
that needs private->cp holds this mutex.
There are a couple where the cio layer's subchannel->lock performs
this role in this code, which isn't correct (it should only be used
when touching the actual subchannel, like cio_enable_subchannel()),
so adjust the locations where that spinlock is acquired/released
to correctly coexist with this new mutex.
Fixes: 0a19e61e6d4c ("vfio: ccw: introduce channel program interfaces")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 10 +++++++++-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 10 +++++++++-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 3 +++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 1a095085bc72..1d8c2ed9da50 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
is_final = !(scsw_actl(&irb->scsw) &
(SCSW_ACTL_DEVACT | SCSW_ACTL_SCHACT));
+
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
if (scsw_is_solicited(&irb->scsw)) {
cp_update_scsw(&private->cp, &irb->scsw);
if (is_final && private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PENDING) {
@@ -98,6 +100,8 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
cp_is_finished = true;
}
}
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
+
mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
memcpy(private->io_region->irb_area, irb, sizeof(*irb));
mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
@@ -259,12 +263,16 @@ static int vfio_ccw_sch_event(struct subchannel *sch, int process)
rc = 0;
if (cio_update_schib(sch)) {
- if (private)
+ if (private) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sch->lock, flags);
vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_NOT_OPER);
+ goto out;
+ }
}
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sch->lock, flags);
+out:
return rc;
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
index 4d7988ea47ef..9fbe97bd23f9 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
@@ -25,17 +25,15 @@ static int fsm_io_helper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sch->lock, flags);
-
orb = cp_get_orb(&private->cp, sch);
- if (!orb) {
- ret = -EIO;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!orb)
+ return -EIO;
VFIO_CCW_TRACE_EVENT(5, "stIO");
VFIO_CCW_TRACE_EVENT(5, dev_name(&sch->dev));
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sch->lock, flags);
+
/* Issue "Start Subchannel" */
ccode = ssch(sch->schid, orb);
@@ -71,7 +69,6 @@ static int fsm_io_helper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private)
default:
ret = ccode;
}
-out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sch->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -171,7 +168,9 @@ static void fsm_notoper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_NOT_OPER;
/* This is usually handled during CLOSE event */
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
cp_free(&private->cp);
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
}
/*
@@ -252,6 +251,8 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PROCESSING;
memcpy(scsw, io_region->scsw_area, sizeof(*scsw));
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
+
if (scsw->cmd.fctl & SCSW_FCTL_START_FUNC) {
orb = (union orb *)io_region->orb_area;
@@ -300,6 +301,8 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
cp_free(&private->cp);
goto err_out;
}
+
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
return;
} else if (scsw->cmd.fctl & SCSW_FCTL_HALT_FUNC) {
VFIO_CCW_MSG_EVENT(2,
@@ -320,6 +323,7 @@ static void fsm_io_request(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
}
err_out:
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_IDLE;
trace_vfio_ccw_fsm_io_request(scsw->cmd.fctl, schid,
io_region->ret_code, errstr);
@@ -410,7 +414,11 @@ static void fsm_close(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_STANDBY;
spin_unlock_irq(&sch->lock);
+
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
cp_free(&private->cp);
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
+
return;
err_unlock:
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 032a1cdf4df7..04800cfa779b 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -38,8 +38,13 @@ static void vfio_ccw_dma_unmap(struct vfio_device *vdev, u64 iova, u64 length)
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
/* Drivers MUST unpin pages in response to an invalidation. */
- if (!cp_iova_pinned(&private->cp, iova, length))
+ mutex_lock(&private->cp_mutex);
+ if (!cp_iova_pinned(&private->cp, iova, length)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
return;
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&private->cp_mutex);
vfio_ccw_mdev_reset(private);
}
@@ -50,6 +55,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_init_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
mutex_init(&private->io_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&private->cp_mutex);
private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_STANDBY;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&private->crw);
INIT_WORK(&private->io_work, vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo);
@@ -90,6 +96,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_init_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
out_free_cp:
kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
out_free_private:
+ mutex_destroy(&private->cp_mutex);
mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -141,6 +148,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_release_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_cmd_region, private->cmd_region);
kmem_cache_free(vfio_ccw_io_region, private->io_region);
kfree(private->cp.guest_cp);
+ mutex_destroy(&private->cp_mutex);
mutex_destroy(&private->io_mutex);
}
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
index 0501d4bbcdbd..ac5aaa78a74b 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct vfio_ccw_parent {
* @schib_region: MMIO region for SCHIB information
* @crw_region: MMIO region for getting channel report words
* @num_regions: number of additional regions
+ * @cp_mutex: protect against concurrent update of CP resources
* @cp: channel program for the current I/O operation
* @irb: irb info received from interrupt
* @scsw: scsw info
@@ -115,7 +116,9 @@ struct vfio_ccw_private {
struct ccw_crw_region *crw_region;
int num_regions;
+ struct mutex cp_mutex;
struct channel_program cp;
+
struct irb irb;
union scsw scsw;
struct list_head crw;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 17:47 [PATCH v3 0/8] s390/vfio_ccw fixes Eric Farman
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] s390/vfio_ccw: free all memory if cp_init() fails Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/vfio_ccw: limit the number of channel program segments Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] s390/vfio_ccw: fix out of bounds check on CCW array Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure first IDAW remains constant Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 20:38 ` Eric Farman
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] s390/vfio_ccw: calculate idal length based on idaw type Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure index for read/write regions are within range Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2026-07-23 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a channel program mutex sashiko-bot
2026-07-23 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a crw lock Eric Farman
2026-07-23 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723174751.1180334-8-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.