All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
To: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jikos@kernel.org, bentiss@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] HID: multitouch: stop the release timer from being rearmed on remove
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:09:58 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724000958.938675-1-qwe.aldo@gmail.com> (raw)

mt_remove() quiesces the sticky-finger timer before stopping the
hardware:

    timer_delete_sync(&td->release_timer);

    sysfs_remove_group(&hdev->dev.kobj, &mt_attribute_group);
    hid_hw_stop(hdev);

timer_delete_sync() waits for a running callback and dequeues the timer,
but it does not stop the timer from being armed again. The transport is
still delivering reports at that point, and the report path rearms it:

    if (app->quirks & MT_QUIRK_STICKY_FINGERS) {
        if (td->mt_io_flags & MT_IO_SLOTS_MASK)
            mod_timer(&td->release_timer,
                      jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100));

A report that arrives after timer_delete_sync() has returned therefore
leaves the timer queued. td is allocated with devm_kzalloc() against
hdev->dev, so it is freed when the driver is unbound, after mt_remove()
returns. When the timer fires afterwards, mt_expired_timeout()
dereferences the freed td:

    struct mt_device *td = timer_container_of(td, t, release_timer);
    struct hid_device *hdev = td->hdev;

    if (test_and_set_bit_lock(MT_IO_FLAGS_RUNNING, &td->mt_io_flags))

Simply moving the teardown after hid_hw_stop() does not fix this on its
own, because mt_expired_timeout() calls mt_release_contacts(), which
walks hdev->inputs; the timer still has to be quiesced before
hid_hw_stop() tears the input devices down.

Use timer_shutdown_sync() instead, which additionally makes any later
mod_timer() a no-op, so neither ordering constraint has to be traded off
against the other. This is the final-teardown pattern the function was
introduced for, and hid-wiimote already uses it for the same reason.

Fixes: 4f4001bc76fd ("HID: multitouch: fix rare Win 8 cases when the touch up event gets missing")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723224211.613112-1-you@example.com?part=1
Signed-off-by: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
---
Found by code inspection after Sashiko AI review flagged the teardown
ordering while reviewing an unrelated patch of mine. I have not
reproduced the use-after-free at runtime: it needs a report to land in
the window between timer_delete_sync() returning and the device being
unbound, which I have no way to drive reliably on the hardware I have.
The window and the rearm path are visible in the code, and the fix does
not depend on the race being hit.

 drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 0495152091e3..f25065b9ec66 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ static void mt_remove(struct hid_device *hdev)
 {
 	struct mt_device *td = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
 
-	timer_delete_sync(&td->release_timer);
+	timer_shutdown_sync(&td->release_timer);
 
 	sysfs_remove_group(&hdev->dev.kobj, &mt_attribute_group);
 	hid_hw_stop(hdev);
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24  0:09 Aldo Ariel Panzardo [this message]
2026-07-24  0:24 ` [PATCH] HID: multitouch: stop the release timer from being rearmed on remove sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260724000958.938675-1-qwe.aldo@gmail.com \
    --to=qwe.aldo@gmail.com \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.