From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y 4/9] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:13:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724101342.16000-4-socketcan@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724101342.16000-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net>
commit 12ce799f7ab1e05bd8fbf79e46f403bfe5597ebc upstream.
Stage new CAN frame content for an existing tx op into a kmalloc()'d
buffer and validate it there, mirroring the approach already used in
bcm_rx_setup(). Only copy the validated data into op->frames while
holding op->bcm_tx_lock, so bcm_can_tx() and bcm_tx_timeout_handler()
can no longer observe a partially updated or unvalidated frame.
Add a missing error path for memcpy_from_msg() when copying CAN frame
data from userspace.
Also move the kt_ival1/kt_ival2/ival1/ival2 updates in bcm_tx_setup()
under op->bcm_tx_lock, and read kt_ival1/kt_ival2/count under the same
lock in bcm_tx_set_expiry() and bcm_tx_timeout_handler(), closing the
torn 64-bit ktime_t read on 32-bit platforms.
Fixes: c2aba69d0c36 ("can: bcm: add locking for bcm_op runtime updates")
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260714-bcm_fixes-v15-6-562f7e3e42da@hartkopp.net
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
---
net/can/bcm.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index cca495c..8397fc2 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct bcm_op {
struct canfd_frame last_sframe;
struct sock *sk;
struct net_device *rx_reg_dev;
- spinlock_t bcm_tx_lock; /* protect currframe/count in runtime updates */
+ spinlock_t bcm_tx_lock; /* protect tx data and timer updates */
spinlock_t bcm_rx_update_lock; /* protect filter/timer data updates */
};
@@ -440,12 +440,18 @@ static bool bcm_tx_set_expiry(struct bcm_op *op, struct hrtimer *hrt)
{
ktime_t ival;
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
if (op->kt_ival1 && op->count)
ival = op->kt_ival1;
- else if (op->kt_ival2)
+ else if (op->kt_ival2) {
ival = op->kt_ival2;
- else
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
return false;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
hrtimer_set_expires(hrt, ktime_add(ktime_get(), ival));
return true;
@@ -462,25 +468,47 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart bcm_tx_timeout_handler(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
{
struct bcm_op *op = container_of(hrtimer, struct bcm_op, timer);
struct bcm_msg_head msg_head;
+ bool tx_ival1, tx_ival2;
+
+ /* snapshot kt_ival1/kt_ival2/count under lock to avoid torn
+ * ktime_t reads racing with concurrent bcm_tx_setup() updates
+ */
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+ tx_ival1 = op->kt_ival1 && (op->count > 0);
+ tx_ival2 = !!op->kt_ival2;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
+ if (tx_ival1) {
+ u32 flags, count;
+ struct bcm_timeval ival1, ival2;
- if (op->kt_ival1 && (op->count > 0)) {
bcm_can_tx(op, NULL);
- if (!op->count && (op->flags & TX_COUNTEVT)) {
+ /* snapshot variables under lock to avoid torn reads racing
+ * with concurrent bcm_tx_setup() updates
+ */
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+ flags = op->flags;
+ count = op->count;
+ ival1 = op->ival1;
+ ival2 = op->ival2;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
+ if (!count && (flags & TX_COUNTEVT)) {
/* create notification to user */
memset(&msg_head, 0, sizeof(msg_head));
msg_head.opcode = TX_EXPIRED;
- msg_head.flags = op->flags;
- msg_head.count = op->count;
- msg_head.ival1 = op->ival1;
- msg_head.ival2 = op->ival2;
+ msg_head.flags = flags;
+ msg_head.count = count;
+ msg_head.ival1 = ival1;
+ msg_head.ival2 = ival2;
msg_head.can_id = op->can_id;
msg_head.nframes = 0;
bcm_send_to_user(op, &msg_head, NULL, 0);
}
- } else if (op->kt_ival2) {
+ } else if (tx_ival2) {
bcm_can_tx(op, NULL);
}
@@ -983,6 +1011,8 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
/* check the given can_id */
op = bcm_find_op(&bo->tx_ops, msg_head, ifindex);
if (op) {
+ void *new_frames;
+
/* update existing BCM operation */
/*
@@ -993,11 +1023,23 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
if (msg_head->nframes > op->nframes)
return -E2BIG;
- /* update CAN frames content */
+ /* get new CAN frames content into a staging buffer before
+ * locking: validate and normalize the frames there so that
+ * bcm_can_tx() / bcm_tx_timeout_handler() never observe a
+ * partially updated or unvalidated frame in op->frames
+ */
+ new_frames = kmalloc(msg_head->nframes * op->cfsiz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!new_frames)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
for (i = 0; i < msg_head->nframes; i++) {
- cf = op->frames + op->cfsiz * i;
+ cf = new_frames + op->cfsiz * i;
err = memcpy_from_msg((u8 *)cf, msg, op->cfsiz);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ kfree(new_frames);
+ return err;
+ }
if (op->flags & CAN_FD_FRAME) {
if (cf->len > 64)
@@ -1007,36 +1049,38 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
err = -EINVAL;
}
- if (err < 0)
+ if (err < 0) {
+ kfree(new_frames);
return err;
+ }
if (msg_head->flags & TX_CP_CAN_ID) {
/* copy can_id into frame */
cf->can_id = msg_head->can_id;
}
}
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+
+ /* update CAN frames content */
+ memcpy(op->frames, new_frames, msg_head->nframes * op->cfsiz);
+
op->flags = msg_head->flags;
- /* only lock for unlikely count/nframes/currframe changes */
if (op->nframes != msg_head->nframes ||
- op->flags & TX_RESET_MULTI_IDX ||
- op->flags & SETTIMER) {
-
- spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
+ op->flags & TX_RESET_MULTI_IDX) {
+ /* potentially update changed nframes */
+ op->nframes = msg_head->nframes;
+ /* restart multiple frame transmission */
+ op->currframe = 0;
+ }
- if (op->nframes != msg_head->nframes ||
- op->flags & TX_RESET_MULTI_IDX) {
- /* potentially update changed nframes */
- op->nframes = msg_head->nframes;
- /* restart multiple frame transmission */
- op->currframe = 0;
- }
+ if (op->flags & SETTIMER)
+ op->count = msg_head->count;
- if (op->flags & SETTIMER)
- op->count = msg_head->count;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
- spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
- }
+ kfree(new_frames);
} else {
/* insert new BCM operation for the given can_id */
@@ -1113,10 +1157,12 @@ static int bcm_tx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
if (op->flags & SETTIMER) {
/* set timer values */
+ spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
op->ival1 = msg_head->ival1;
op->ival2 = msg_head->ival2;
op->kt_ival1 = bcm_timeval_to_ktime(msg_head->ival1);
op->kt_ival2 = bcm_timeval_to_ktime(msg_head->ival2);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
/* disable an active timer due to zero values? */
if (!op->kt_ival1 && !op->kt_ival2)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 15:12 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-24 8:35 ` [PATCH 1/9] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y " Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 2/9] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 3/9] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 5/9] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 6/9] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 7/9] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 8/9] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 9/9] can: bcm: track a single source interface for ANYDEV timeout/throttle ops Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-24 10:38 ` [PATCH 5.10.y 1/9] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Greg KH
2026-07-24 10:43 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-28 16:09 ` Sasha Levin
2026-07-28 16:45 ` Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724101342.16000-4-socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.