From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Tal Zussman <tz2294@columbia.edu>,
Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] xfs: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for bounce buffered read I/Os
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724125434.GA27168@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amMvIEtEtRrNE7A_@aalbersh-thinkpadx1carbongen13.rmtcz.csb>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:38:53AM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> On 2026-07-24 08:21:20, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 05:58:49PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> > > I would probably need something like this for fsverity.
> > >
> > > When using integrity checksums with fsverity together, both file data
> > > ioends and fsverity metadata ioends get onto the inode queue
> > > (without checksums there's no metadata ioends). This way worker could
> > > self-deadlock if data ioend processed first in xfs_end_io(). It will
> > > call verify_bio to read merkle pages which could be already waiting
> > > in queue.
> >
> > Yes. Same as the situation we have (or had as this is changing
> > for 7.3) with fsverity and fscrypt.
> >
> > > I initially considered changing xfs_end_io, for read ioends, to just
> > > schedule them instead of adding to the queue, but decided just sort
> > > metadata ioends first in the queue [1] as a bit simpler fix.
> > >
> > > The difference is that work won't be scheduled on the high-priority
> > > fsverity's workqueue. Not sure how critical this is as with
> > > checksums all reads would be the same priority.
> >
> > I'll need to go back to your series, but just sorting isn't going
> > to fix the problem, as the reading of the verity metadata could
> > be kicked off from the completion workqueue and you could be blocking
> > the rescuer thread. So either verity needs it's own WQ, or we'd need
> > some way for a currently running I/O completion to exit and get
> > restarted.
>
> Oh I see, then, the data reads could be queue further with
> fsverity_enqueue_verify_work(ioend). This way bio completion queue
> can continue process incoming metadata reads while data ioend is
> waiting for verification.
fsverity_enqueue_verify_work would actually really benefit from doing
a list (percpu or otherwise) so that the caller only needs a single
or doubly linked list entry instead of adding another struct.
But if we don't want to do that work yet, adding a verity context
of some sort and using fsverity_enqueue_verify_work could work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 14:49 lazy bounce buffering for checksummed reads Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/22] iomap: add a separate bio_set for iomap_split_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-24 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/22] block: remove bip_should_check Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/22] block: lift BIP_CHECK_FLAGS to include/linux/bio-integrity.h Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/22] block: handle nogenerate/noverify properly in fs-integrity Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 17:05 ` Anuj gupta
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 05/22] iomap: don't free integrity payload that doesn't exist Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 16:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/22] block,iomap: fix protection information verification with initial bvec offset Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/22] block: add task-context bio completion infrastructure Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/22] block: don't delay bio task completions Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/22] block: split bio_iov_iter_bounce_write Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/22] block: export fs_bio_integrity_{alloc,free} Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 11/22] block: don't include blk-integrity.h in bdev.c Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 12/22] iomap: better read bounce buffering support Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 21:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-24 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 13/22] iomap: add a iomap_ioend_flags helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 20:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 14/22] iomap: add a IOMAP_IOEND_INTEGRITY flag Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 20:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 15/22] iomap,xfs: move T10 PI handling for direct I/O into ->submit_io Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 20:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 16/22] xfs: move PI generation into xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 20:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 17/22] xfs: split ioend handling into a separate source file Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 20:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 18/22] xfs: use BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK for bounce buffered read I/Os Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 15:58 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-07-24 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 9:38 ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-07-24 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-23 20:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-24 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 19/22] iomap,xfs: move integrity verification to the file system Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 21:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-24 6:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 20/22] xfs: add support for lazy direct read bounce buffering Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 21:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-24 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 21/22] xfs: add error injection for lazy " Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 21:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 22/22] xfs: log a message at mount time when using integrity protection Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-23 21:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-24 6:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724125434.GA27168@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
--cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.