From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Luo Jie" <jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add NSS clock support
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:15:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724151502.E83701F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724-qcom_ipq5210_cmnpll-v1-4-a8b8679d215f@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] clk_nss_ppe_determine_rate violates the clock framework API contract when req->rate is 0.
- [Medium] Modifying the NSS clock divider resets the entire CMN PLL block, potentially disrupting other shared fixed-rate clocks.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 04/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add NSS clock support ---
commit b809b8bd5941993b064f7e68f395a77c3ea61452
Author: Luo Jie <jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com>
clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add NSS clock support
The NSS (network subsystem) clock is derived from the CMN PLL output
divided by 2 and then further divided by a configurable 6-bit divider
with a valid range of 8-63.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/ipq-cmn-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/ipq-cmn-pll.c
> index aa319d577871a..3df326c22fbac 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/ipq-cmn-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/ipq-cmn-pll.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -364,11 +369,105 @@ static struct clk_hw *ipq_cmn_pll_clk_hw_register(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return &cmn_pll->hw;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * NSS (Network Subsystem) clock operations.
> + * The NSS clock is derived from CMN PLL rate / 2, then divided by
> + * a configurable 6-bit divider (8-63).
> + */
[ ... ]
> +static int clk_nss_ppe_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + unsigned long div;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!req->rate))
> + return 0;
[Severity: Medium]
When req->rate is 0, this returns 0 (success) without updating req->rate to a
valid boundary or returning an error code like -EINVAL.
Can this regression violate the clock framework API contract by falsely
indicating to consumers that 0 Hz is a supported configuration?
> +
> + div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, 2ULL * req->rate);
> + div = clamp_t(unsigned long, div, CMN_PLL_NSS_PPE_DIV_MIN,
> + CMN_PLL_NSS_PPE_DIV_MAX);
> +
> + req->rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)req->best_parent_rate, 2ULL * div);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_nss_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(nss_clk->regmap, CMN_PLL_NSS_PPE_FREQ_CTRL,
> + CMN_PLL_NSS_CLK_SEL,
> + FIELD_PREP(CMN_PLL_NSS_CLK_SEL, div));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return clk_cmn_pll_ana_soft_reset(nss_clk->regmap);
[Severity: Medium]
Does updating the leaf NSS clock divider strictly require a hardware-level
analog reset of the parent PLL block?
Calling clk_cmn_pll_ana_soft_reset() drops the global PLL lock by toggling
CMN_ANA_EN_SW_RSTN:
clk_cmn_pll_ana_soft_reset() {
...
ret = regmap_clear_bits(regmap, CMN_PLL_POWER_ON_AND_RESET,
CMN_ANA_EN_SW_RSTN);
...
}
Will this regression interrupt other derived clocks (e.g., PCIe, WLAN,
SYS_CLK) and cause link drops or system instability whenever the NSS divider
is dynamically updated?
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260724-qcom_ipq5210_cmnpll-v1-0-a8b8679d215f@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-24 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 15:00 [PATCH 00/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add IPQ5210 CMN PLL support Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 01/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Use devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_data Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:50 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 02/12] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add CMN PLL support for IPQ5210 SoC Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 03/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add analog soft-reset helper Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 04/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add NSS clock support Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 05/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add PPE " Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 06/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add PON reference " Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 07/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add EPHY-RAW " Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 08/12] clk: composite: Export devm_clk_hw_register_composite_pdata Luo Jie
2026-07-24 16:01 ` Brian Masney
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 09/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add clock gate support for fixed clocks Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 10/12] clk: qcom: ipq-cmn-pll: Add all output clocks for IPQ5210 Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 11/12] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add CMN PLL device node Luo Jie
2026-07-24 15:00 ` [PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: qcom: Update IPQ5210 xo_board to use fixed factor clock Luo Jie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260724151502.E83701F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.