All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>,
	Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
	Yuezhang Mo <yuezhang.mo@sony.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exfat: preserve allocated extents for swap activation
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:53:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260724155307.GA7398@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd--N_2nY5XPr3vNyb7Ai+xYbuR3EE4ivecVf6Eur-vC_w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 09:57:49AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 4:19 AM Harshit Mogalapalli
> <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > exFAT reports allocated ranges beyond valid_size as IOMAP_HOLE whenever
> > IOMAP_REPORT is set. iomap_swapfile_activate() also uses IOMAP_REPORT
> > while collecting a swapfile's physical extents, so it treats the
> > preallocated tail as unallocated and rejects the file with -EINVAL.
> >
> > Allocated space beyond valid_size is not a hole. Keep it as
> > IOMAP_UNWRITTEN so iomap consumers that need physical extent identity,
> > such as swap activation, can still use it. The iomap seek helpers
> > already handle unwritten extents appropriately for SEEK_HOLE and
> > SEEK_DATA.
> >
> > Fixes: b4b7fe2c7cbf ("exfat: add support for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA in llseek")
> > Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.6
> > Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > LTP swapon/swapoff tests failed on exFAT, with this patch the tests
> > pass.
> > ---
> >  fs/exfat/iomap.c | 16 ++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/exfat/iomap.c b/fs/exfat/iomap.c
> > index 190fc6471f84..24d93288a432 100644
> > --- a/fs/exfat/iomap.c
> > +++ b/fs/exfat/iomap.c
> > @@ -105,18 +105,14 @@ static int __exfat_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length
> >                  * marks the exact boundary between valid data and
> >                  * holes (or unwritten space).
> >                  *
> > -                * When IOMAP_REPORT is set (used by lseek(SEEK_HOLE)
> > -                * and SEEK_DATA), we return IOMAP_HOLE. This allows
> > -                * iomap_seek_hole_iter() to directly return the
> > -                * precise byte position.
> > -                *
> > -                * For normal I/O paths (without IOMAP_REPORT) we
> > -                * return IOMAP_UNWRITTEN so the write path can
> > -                * distinguish it from a real hole.
> > +                * Allocated space beyond valid_size is not a hole. Report it
> > +                * as IOMAP_UNWRITTEN so iomap consumers that need physical
> > +                * extent identity, such as swap activation, can still use it.
> > +                * The iomap seek helpers already handle unwritten extents
> > +                * appropriately for SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA.
> >                  */
> >                 if (offset >= ei->valid_size) {
> > -                       iomap->type = flags & IOMAP_REPORT ?
> > -                               IOMAP_HOLE : IOMAP_UNWRITTEN;
> > +                       iomap->type = IOMAP_UNWRITTEN;
> Returning IOMAP_UNWRITTEN with IOMAP_REPORT can make SEEK_HOLE rely on
> page-cache/block-granularity handling, which can lose the
> byte-accurate valid_size boundary. Before activating the swapfile,
> extending ->valid_size to i_size through exfat_extend_valid_size()
> safely zeroes the preallocated range and makes it valid for swap use.

iomap swapfile activation can handle unwritten extents (unlike the bmap
activation codepath) so you probably only need to bump valid_size up to
the next max(PAGE_SIZE, i_blocksize) boundary.  The swap code writes
to the underlying disk blocks directly, bypassing the filesystem.

--D

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23 19:19 [PATCH] exfat: preserve allocated extents for swap activation Harshit Mogalapalli
2026-07-23 22:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-07-24  0:57 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-07-24 15:53   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260724155307.GA7398@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.