From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AED89233938; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784934970; cv=none; b=IQRvhAR/V2jyPQNbMgu3US1TrJXOvNb+5BA4m2a50i/OgX3PbXJbT4guR3ny4phxT/XxOyrXy0pYpI0aIOWhPHWDPlorHszokEiy73BgqbKPpYwLYHGwcoCKRpaAOm/K4251ZBWSLUMg8eWtw6RKrTleew7oc09V0L2O3NszkEY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784934970; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mZlUvBrixQww5im3DZiKZu9byltt2XofZQxmSZSZnPU=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=AJaQ/WWQE3jQAXwj/wJiVPFYIa+jJ0hn2KtAOYn1xMWy2s97GicpUgC+a4EJFMejZAJVCFqXEux4B+izVsQ6bLlc6OCyLKLDXjV7xGu6H3wVHjKtlb5whOfOTfaWZLP7EqfbFHeo56/zk3WqDquwAzImSv0/iQlOuCfuvdmCSak= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=euqT/Aiu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="euqT/Aiu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 092C21F000E9; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:16:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784934969; bh=mZlUvBrixQww5im3DZiKZu9byltt2XofZQxmSZSZnPU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=euqT/AiuVk3etYMIh4ykQR+30BoH9iRNtQb+G3+QSeh/kehx0JE64v3+9Sh1trCzL BpHLlMNZROIjbtOzHHN86jprxvXyDHGIPq7CMO9UMQb6Di+ETApGhezQ02DS/qVnG4 D+K8UMNAG4wGozzcPK7jLsRNJHnmjLUhLxCG6z+Rj9Rhe5G69jX3iUD53Us0Lo61OU dLm3MMolJzywU4eM8w9brZ+dY7j1yyXY8IN5lcNsgPutRvC5nLE11v0Nx0fJJ3fd6R AWnMqa8ulKxKnaqA+5Uy+T4m1h/mXpBv129zgalU/uF8BFa+akKCpT8/L7nt0mcGTQ fL9ojPVqs/KGQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] PCI: Add controller reset method Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: wei.liu@kernel.org Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260724230844.3259741-2-wei.liu@kernel.org> References: <20260724230844.3259741-1-wei.liu@kernel.org> <20260724230844.3259741-2-wei.liu@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:16:08 +0000 Message-Id: <20260724231609.092C21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Wei Liu >=20 > Some PCI controllers provide a function reset mechanism that is not > advertised in PCI configuration space. Allow them to expose it through an > optional pci_ops callback. >=20 > Add the controller reset method to the standard reset_method interface. > Prefer FLR and AF FLR by default, and use the controller operation before > PM and bus reset fallbacks. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260724230844.3259= 741-1-wei.liu@kernel.org?part=3D1