All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Lytkin <iprintercanon@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, urezki@gmail.com, shivamkalra98@zohomail.in,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/vmalloc: fix 32-bit truncation of the area size in vread_iter()
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:46:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726094637.3210-1-iprintercanon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260725144834.76cd9aa557e72aa02688948f@linux-foundation.org>

On Sat, 25 Jul 2026 14:48:34 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> I wonder how much of this stuff would go away if we were to make
> vm_struct.nr_pages an unsigned long?  It's already using 64 bits in the
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC=n case.

All the casts, and it's free.

sizeof(struct vm_struct) is 72 today either way. As unsigned long it
stays 72 with HUGE_VMALLOC=n, the 4 byte hole before phys_addr takes it,
and goes to 80 with =y where page_order and nr_pages share a slot. Both
land in kmalloc-96, which is what __get_vm_area_node() allocates from, so
nothing really grows.

That kills both casts here plus the four in vrealloc_node_align_noprof(),
as long as new_nr_pages and old_nr_pages get widened with it. Nothing
outside mm/vmalloc.c needs touching.

It doesn't get all the narrowing though: vm_area_alloc_pages() still
takes and returns unsigned int, nr_small_pages is its own local off size,
"pages=%d" wants %lu, and show_numa_info() uses one unsigned int for both
the page index and the node id.

I'd rather not fold that in here, 1/2 is the kcore regression and the bit
worth backporting. I'll send the widening on top with all of the above in
it.

As for the findings: the vrealloc truncation is 4418, which is 2/2 here,
and there's nothing else narrow left in that function.

nr_small_pages is real but needs more than 16 TiB of RAM, since
__vmalloc_node_range_noprof() checks size >> PAGE_SHIFT against
totalram_pages() first, and I couldn't find a caller allocating that much
in one go. Fixing it alone buys nothing while the other counts are 32
bit, so it goes in the widening patch.

The __GFP_ZERO one I don't think is a bug. The shrink path zeroes when
want_init_on_free() or want_init_on_alloc() is set, and the kerneldoc
already requires callers passing __GFP_ZERO to pass it on every call.

Thanks,
Artem

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-26  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-25 13:22 [PATCH 1/2] mm/vmalloc: fix 32-bit truncation of the area size in vread_iter() Artem Lytkin
2026-07-25 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-26  9:46   ` Artem Lytkin [this message]
2026-07-26 15:25   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260726094637.3210-1-iprintercanon@gmail.com \
    --to=iprintercanon@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shivamkalra98@zohomail.in \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.