All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jwlee2217@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	qw3rtyp0@gmail.com
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y, 6.1.y, 6.6.y] posix-cpu-timers: Prevent UAF caused by non-leader exec()
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 17:24:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726195203.stable-0004@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ecgqkf54.ffs@fw13>

Thanks for doing these.  I have queued the 6.12 one, but I would like to
ask for a v2 of this one before taking 6.6, 6.1 and 5.15.

> @@ -714,7 +781,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_
>  		 * it as an overrun (thanks to bump_cpu_timer above).
>  		 */
>  		unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
> -		goto out;
> +		return ret;
>  	}

[...]

> +	if (old)
> +		old->it_interval = ns_to_timespec64(old_incr);
> +
[...]
> - out:
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -	if (old)
> -		old->it_interval = ns_to_timespec64(old_incr);

On these trees that changes user-visible behaviour on the TIMER_RETRY
path.  Before the patch the "goto out" fell through the shared out:
label, which filled in old->it_interval; afterwards the early return
skips it and the assignment only runs on the success path.

Upstream that is harmless because bfa408f03fc7 ("posix-timers: Retrieve
interval in common timer_settime() code") moved the interval retrieval
into the common code, but that landed in v6.12 and 6.6, 6.1 and 5.15 do
not have it.  Their do_timer_settime() sets old_spec64 = NULL before it
goes back around the retry loop, so a timer_settime() that races timer
expiry now reports old_value.it_interval == {0,0} instead of the
previous interval.

Does it make sense?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-26 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-21  9:16 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: Prevent UAF caused by non-leader exec()" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-25 20:06 ` [PATCH 5.15.y, 6.1.y, 6.6.y] posix-cpu-timers: Prevent UAF caused by non-leader exec() Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-26 21:24   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-07-26 22:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-27  9:10       ` [PATCH V2 " Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-27 22:19         ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260726195203.stable-0004@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jwlee2217@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=qw3rtyp0@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.