From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 221673E0C7A; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785182373; cv=none; b=UrYZOOjclzpjpasDYDdCGVcNys6TPTS3A2LDRXoTCmo/dOccwrbfxqSLslLAYQlQdxHNANdsLMTQlAz69bSzDORZIhtZbRnBxYvoCsbUJWPJ++0cyL1nZxAsGyx1zIb/22ctQKYFTJq6c/QEqpSmxU2hRjd2Zq27mBCFaV6snuE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785182373; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FLBmVTd819rjVdz6WKwpajtkqhS3+hfih6Ghu58PyWk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NssE4b5ozla73rFQoMyIWnKeHR48OUWgxmL3Mwl3crLxtRAfzhZA8dnRf2nww4voEz6c3jDLNM4hjOASL34ToI+vExZZpvl6o7RZ8CV8GmyisUgWgsNOVj0uv07nobVeWUtvl+CUkgzt358vISfDFih77i3VFeo6GGSP5gesAqc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Cpe8V1qo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Cpe8V1qo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 140551F000E9; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:59:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785182362; bh=n/yvjIcw5QaNnhiVtdTRqE8CydXDUvrWbE6SFMgpj/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Cpe8V1qoWEZ/ikuucBiwtzmd87494Dd+/pI83F7qba4mdWCCpw0TNpRn76kkJ9Aym qNUZmXL+jCEG0dwxX0y0LXEApaGEmUMVurfpDHoEwCdtVzA2urH/4SUhiWP3Qwad/N 0PDMbYMJPcqsy0XUrvvM01IZxcUZzGjsUWtp71i4KkKNQqXPueWrrvD8B+tlBgB/LI CqxIhWXFMgos/RkgnziEW4u+3VkaKM3Y5RxYyK/m5M6sHv6CE8OrEZymQnMy3buaNf iVPrTezMjhcl9UTpL1dAfFq0uZbx2mqysEOHOoU3l6hUe9RTVz8JALsBeu2eSJJnjW 1HwRLGL36/DGw== Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:59:21 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Ivan Vecera Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Chris du Quesnay , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , "David S. Miller" , Jiri Pirko , Michal Schmidt , Paolo Abeni , Pasi Vaananen , Petr Oros , Prathosh Satish , Richard Cochran , Simon Horman , Vadim Fedorenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] dpll: zl3073x: add PTP clock support Message-ID: <20260727125921.2e16bed9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260713103739.1553284-1-ivecera@redhat.com> <20260713103739.1553284-3-ivecera@redhat.com> <20260722135848.2d401ada@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:33:35 +0200 Ivan Vecera wrote: >> Real dependency is probably better here? >> The Optional is meant for NICs for which PTP truly is a side-feature. > > There are some chip variants that don't support PTP. Should we depend non-optionally? That's what I would do.