From: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
"Long Li" <longli@microsoft.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Suravee Suthikulpanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"Vasant Hegde" <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:51:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728135117.2888175-3-namjain@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728135117.2888175-1-namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
fixup_irqs() re-injects a pending interrupt on its new target CPU by
looking at the outermost domain chip and invoking its irq_retrigger()
callback directly. That only works when the outermost chip happens to
install an irq_retrigger() callback, which is not guaranteed for every
irqchip and could lead to lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug.
Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() instead, which walks up the interrupt
hierarchy until it finds a chip that implements irq_retrigger().
While at it, move the loop-local variables into the loop scope and use a
scoped guard for desc->lock.
No functional change intended for chips which already provide an
irq_retrigger() callback on the outermost domain.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 23 +++++++----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 30122f0b3af96..ef1bdd3c4659a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -466,11 +466,6 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_posted_msi_notification)
/* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
void fixup_irqs(void)
{
- unsigned int vector;
- struct irq_desc *desc;
- struct irq_data *data;
- struct irq_chip *chip;
-
irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu();
/*
@@ -489,22 +484,18 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
* vector_lock because the cpu is already marked !online, so
* nothing else will touch it.
*/
- for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector])))
+ for (unsigned int vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
+ struct irq_desc *desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))
continue;
if (is_vector_pending(vector)) {
- desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
-
- raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
- data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
- chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
- if (chip->irq_retrigger) {
- chip->irq_retrigger(data);
+ guard(raw_spinlock)(&desc->lock);
+ if (irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(&desc->irq_data))
__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_RETRIGGERED);
- }
- raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
}
+
if (__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]) != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED)
__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 13:51 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: Fix lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug for Hyper-V PCI/MSI Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip Naman Jain
2026-07-28 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 13:51 ` Naman Jain [this message]
2026-07-28 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs() sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq, iommu/amd, PCI: Drop redundant irq_retrigger inits Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728135117.2888175-3-namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.