From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52EE3311958 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785247231; cv=none; b=TFhAZEPKchcy7nO+b74siRpt2/9OtVSx+tDPQl8CWtG0E05vrtxCqaLr+A9367QyHZorqkYzTe9RA5JQhfwcGoJVMSGRiGah/NPX2DCZO/KwayHeKH8YIQcaEMrPlKILlbmLfTny2LAkI8fgzJexrGBWyUiUGA5RILqICCmuJFY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785247231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6mK5SkBWXYIBbxx0oqnM/n5dsYiyxtUrCfM/P133yxg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=MyOLIjlqF6sIZRjYa+uKPvPGPVCX5KcQz39uTyfeUb6Ci5ANY0OT3mWWS7DEUWlZU3MVhGq/+5teG+S2AuYB+d7voLGKRlwRESELe+T+IeMepU4TH56M3CSFry36XGEH17/QxOaf4cxa0qqZ8RIL1t8RbA3vePIkoHfxVM1Q2lg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QVmUQcrP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QVmUQcrP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1785247230; x=1816783230; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=6mK5SkBWXYIBbxx0oqnM/n5dsYiyxtUrCfM/P133yxg=; b=QVmUQcrP2U/FlNiQ/XLCCIfyVHnWT9Zlb7nnUqAp+haanuBM854NlCOJ wbcXGqIEZ6TR+VBOj05bfQSiyApVsDDC6OfJHVDhe9IWdkxuN40xOOuAm bq6JiMgXXgB6JJ4rgvITqq8vnQMx+9ArT/nLccQsaw1okXY8FgMHWjCNQ tFJ18jFMIV7rIIa478H4xhLPYg8PqBVCBRrib8bujRgz3fNollRdeN9id rUXuaKcSMlDlwFNgkLh5c9DqKNf5Qa8/PP7cyt9Pj2bA0TjuqyyXC+9qV 8q3QZjV/5Zy/zgq0ycBJGXOYnfir7V7cIGE7/Xh74V8JS+vrewtqDrbt1 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kI5cSAK9TU2l6uPxmgN2zQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZN9U4LLQQTqwUP8G9aMhow== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11859"; a="97344800" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,190,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="97344800" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jul 2026 07:00:29 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LxUD4J/YSaWHRFEbp5PxWQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PRELwxK0SiWQsOO7jUx52w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,190,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="283047845" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO ea128546eb3d) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2026 07:00:27 -0700 Received: from kbuild by ea128546eb3d with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1woiM5-00000000ePn-0JjB; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:00:25 +0000 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:00:18 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [mcgrof:blk-iobuf-pool-v5 6/9] block/ioctl.c:958:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'blk_uring_cmd_alloc_iobuf'; did you mean 'blkdev_cmd_alloc_iobuf'? Message-ID: <202607282158.kSJTNTZa-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux.git blk-iobuf-pool-v5 head: de80bacbf04a137715357b6a2948d9f29a18d990 commit: 37ff77d98dbfae93b246dadfe1d25b768b9e8798 [6/9] block: add a uring command for pool-backed fixed buffers config: alpha-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260728/202607282158.kSJTNTZa-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260728/202607282158.kSJTNTZa-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607282158.kSJTNTZa-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): block/ioctl.c: In function 'blkdev_cmd_alloc_iobuf': >> block/ioctl.c:958:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'blk_uring_cmd_alloc_iobuf'; did you mean 'blkdev_cmd_alloc_iobuf'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 958 | ret = blk_uring_cmd_alloc_iobuf(cmd, pool, buf_index, len, issue_flags); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | blkdev_cmd_alloc_iobuf vim +958 block/ioctl.c 947 948 static int blkdev_cmd_alloc_iobuf(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, 949 struct block_device *bdev, u64 buf_index, 950 u64 len, unsigned int issue_flags) 951 { 952 struct blk_iobuf_pool *pool; 953 int ret; 954 955 pool = blk_queue_get_iobuf_pool(bdev_get_queue(bdev)); 956 if (!pool) 957 return -EOPNOTSUPP; > 958 ret = blk_uring_cmd_alloc_iobuf(cmd, pool, buf_index, len, issue_flags); 959 blk_iobuf_pool_put(pool); 960 return ret; 961 } 962 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki