All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "John Garry" <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 17/27] scsi-multipath: revalidate paths upon device unblock
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:54:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729145423.D8E481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729105107.255712-18-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Calling `scsi_mpath_revalidate_paths()` outside `sdev->state_mutex` without a NULL check leads to TOCTOU races with device removal or allocation, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] Direct callers of `scsi_internal_device_unblock_nowait` bypass path revalidation, which can leave queued bios indefinitely stalled.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch calls `mpath_revalidate_paths()`, which schedules `requeue_work` on a background workqueue, but the teardown path fails to cancel this work, leading to a Use-After-Free.
--

--- Patch [17]: [PATCH v6 17/27] scsi-multipath: revalidate paths upon device unblock ---
commit 6253cb1fc352f4ec6d0d42ac99c1827b35592ff4
Author: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>

scsi-multipath: revalidate paths upon device unblock

When a scsi_device is unblocked, we need revalidate paths which means that
we clear paths and requeue any queued bios.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index a1ec11050090c..6a2d7dbfbe8c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -3092,6 +3092,8 @@ static int scsi_internal_device_unblock(struct scsi_device *sdev,
>  	mutex_lock(&sdev->state_mutex);
>  	ret = scsi_internal_device_unblock_nowait(sdev, new_state);
>  	mutex_unlock(&sdev->state_mutex);
> +	if ((ret == 0) && sdev->scsi_mpath_dev)
> +		scsi_mpath_revalidate_paths(sdev->scsi_mpath_dev);

[Severity: High]
Is it safe to access sdev->scsi_mpath_dev and call scsi_mpath_revalidate_paths()
outside of sdev->state_mutex?

It seems that concurrently, __scsi_remove_device() could nullify
scsi_mpath_dev->scsi_mpath_head. A similar race might exist during device
initialization before the head is populated.

When scsi_mpath_revalidate_paths() is then called, it blindly computes the
offset to &scsi_mpath_head->mpath_head, which could lead to a NULL pointer
dereference.

[Severity: High]
Does placing this hook in the wrapper bypass path revalidation for some drivers?

Low-level drivers like mpt3sas and scsi_transport_srp call the core API
scsi_internal_device_unblock_nowait() directly. Since the revalidation is
only added to the scsi_internal_device_unblock() wrapper, won't devices managed
by those drivers miss path revalidation when unblocked, potentially leaving
queued bios permanently stalled?

>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c
> index b23cd6f12c602..12750621a7fc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -238,6 +238,14 @@ static int scsi_multipath_sdev_init(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +void scsi_mpath_revalidate_paths(struct scsi_mpath_device *scsi_mpath_dev)
> +{
> +       struct scsi_mpath_head *scsi_mpath_head = scsi_mpath_dev->scsi_mpath_head;
> +       struct mpath_head *mpath_head = &scsi_mpath_head->mpath_head;
> +
> +       mpath_revalidate_paths(mpath_head);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by introducing this new asynchronous trigger,
could we run into a use-after-free during device removal?

Calling mpath_revalidate_paths() queues mpath_head->requeue_work. If the device
is subsequently removed, the teardown path in scsi_mpath_head_release() frees
scsi_mpath_head via kfree():

drivers/scsi/scsi_multipath.c:scsi_mpath_head_release() {
    ...
    mpath_head_uninit(mpath_head);
    kfree(scsi_mpath_head);
}

Because cancel_work_sync(&mpath_head->requeue_work) is missing from the teardown
logic, could the pending work execute on a freed mpath_head structure?

> +}
> +

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729105107.255712-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com?part=17

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-29 10:50 [PATCH v6 00/27] Native SCSI Multipath support John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 01/27] libmultipath: Add initial framework John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 02/27] libmultipath: Add basic gendisk support John Garry
2026-07-29 11:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 11:36     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 03/27] libmultipath: Add path selection support John Garry
2026-07-29 11:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 11:41     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 04/27] libmultipath: Add bio handling John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 05/27] libmultipath: Add support for mpath_device management John Garry
2026-07-29 11:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 12:11     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 06/27] libmultipath: Add delayed removal support John Garry
2026-07-29 12:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 12:15     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 07/27] libmultipath: Add sysfs helpers John Garry
2026-07-29 12:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 12:51     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 08/27] libmultipath: Add support for block device IOCTL John Garry
2026-07-29 12:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 12:53     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 09/27] libmultipath: Add mpath_bdev_getgeo() John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 10/27] libmultipath: Add mpath_bdev_get_unique_id() John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 11/27] scsi-multipath: introduce basic SCSI device support John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 12/27] scsi-multipath: introduce scsi_device head structure John Garry
2026-07-29 13:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 14:06     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 13/27] scsi-multipath: provide sysfs link from to scsi_device John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 14/27] scsi-multipath: support iopolicy John Garry
2026-07-29 14:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 14:11     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 15/27] scsi-multipath: clone each bio John Garry
2026-07-29 14:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 14:25     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 16/27] scsi-multipath: clear path when device is blocked John Garry
2026-07-29 14:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 14:51     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 17/27] scsi-multipath: revalidate paths upon device unblock John Garry
2026-07-29 14:54   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-29 15:27     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 18/27] scsi-multipath: failover handling John Garry
2026-07-29 15:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 19/27] scsi-multipath: provide callbacks for path state John Garry
2026-07-29 15:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 16:54     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 20/27] scsi-multipath: add scsi_mpath_{start,end}_request() John Garry
2026-07-29 16:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 16:55     ` John Garry
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 21/27] scsi-multipath: add delayed disk removal support John Garry
2026-07-29 16:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 22/27] scsi: sd: add multipath disk class John Garry
2026-07-29 16:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 23/27] scsi: sd: add multipath disk attr groups John Garry
2026-07-29 16:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 24/27] scsi: sd: support multipath disk John Garry
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 25/27] scsi: sd: add mpath_dev file John Garry
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 26/27] scsi: sd: add mpath_numa_nodes dev attribute John Garry
2026-07-29 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 27/27] scsi: sd: add mpath_queue_depth " John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260729145423.D8E481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.