From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954F0175A68 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785389801; cv=none; b=OL/IHmyeA4fE0qtF5vJWI7GsddDWZRORe3YO1CJJHGMbMz963v2Hu571f8AAEWlGUcLEOuRZkzFBOcVMYkUSVlQdSWcZ71ueLZxT/NerhSZYh8udeMa+Ec1vjCSt5BxREFPSiGLdwJCb1ILzHZrB28wPLywEXd0Nu78/e/8WfRI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785389801; c=relaxed/simple; bh=906fGhlN0H52RxAt78Bi2IZsjXYbsLgWFoKOHX03dTw=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=SCKAARwMXsQ92KPL5lndxT4TcU8+peA+G4VajXf6MDppNjA7RGUY8dRXzo8kMgWxCtbJUCBioCuUaygh3WUk0MyozTL/V5JZSBiVgKqSn1m9BP2Aj3SD48KXuxRBmEzGRMx0dqEs0MPcajz/ZmgxAj5zSiXmiS6QbRoLQ2dtPF4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=j+YyWgLT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j+YyWgLT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAF171F000E9; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:36:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785389800; bh=906fGhlN0H52RxAt78Bi2IZsjXYbsLgWFoKOHX03dTw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=j+YyWgLTUvcHPWtuqj4jPIjTKw0tGiQhcZyMiYxT0MLUYAyUs5CQa0KzlZoP6b3yk dDAIU3O2+PF+xRFl99BU+fSb1HOxOKWF454XzhVOd0zDLa9MwywhVYsq2R1FozAWDV tJCI90e7ssCiKGlzcfSUFd/bhreD1Qdck9aWE5GTNl7yeJlxHlNky7uD75K1Mdqfeg o0GQNrRrXl4Yk/gjhOpuX9HnnOI3j+JPWbwj+6Q4583yZkDMNd3ZV2P1yMfnGVVSIR c6o5Cgc8VG/L9zdLiZhkJq8MkrcvU51Ewo6LaA5RBRrJW3u1b0AQSSMsPsVc9qVAyO KGISubb1keZKg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: s390: Remove cond_resched() calls Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Heiko Carstens" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260730052907.2607026-3-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260730052907.2607026-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20260730052907.2607026-3-hca@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 05:36:39 +0000 Message-Id: <20260730053639.CAF171F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Since [1] cond_resched() is a no-op on s390. Remove all calls. >=20 > This also entirely removes uv_call_sched() and replaces all call sites > with uv_call(), since both functions are identical after the removal > of cond_resched(). >=20 > [1] commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730052907.2607= 026-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3D2