All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luka.gejak@linux.dev
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
	Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] wifi: rtw88: record beacons from the target BSSID before authenticating
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:45:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730074504.19725-9-luka.gejak@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3158b4edeb649839eb8063367a97a06@realtek.com>

From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>

On 27/07/2026 09:27, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> I know vendor driver does wait for a beacon, but I don't think this can
> affect connection. Could you confirm this again?

Confirmed, and you are right. This patch is dropped in v3.

I built the series with the wait removed and left everything else
alone, then ran association attempts from a cold module reload and from
a warm reconnect:

  with the wait:     10/10 cold, 10/10 warm
  without the wait:  12/12 cold, 12/12 warm

Time to wpa_state=COMPLETED was the same in both, around 4 s, with one
outlier either way.

Looking at it again the reason is visible in the patch itself: the
pre-auth deauth in patch 11 already sleeps 100 ms afterwards, and the
recording window opens before that sleep, so on a 100 ms beacon
interval the wait had almost always already been satisfied by the time
it was reached. It was measuring the sleep, not doing anything.

Dropping it also removes struct rtw_auth_sync, so your point about
using a completion instead of the spinlock, and the caller check in the
RX path, are both moot. Thanks for pushing on it.

Best regards,
Luka Gejak

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-25 15:04 [PATCH v2 00/11] wifi: rtw88: preparations for RTL8723B/RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] wifi: rtw88: add the RTL8723B chip type and SDIO helper luka.gejak
2026-07-27  7:12   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-27 13:25     ` Luka Gejak
2026-07-30  6:27       ` Luka Gejak
2026-07-30  9:21         ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:44     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-30  9:17       ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] wifi: rtw88: rx: mark zero length packets on RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-27  7:14   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:44     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] wifi: rtw88: fw: add the GNT_BT firmware command luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] wifi: rtw88: fw: fix the reserved page upload on RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-27  7:37   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:44     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] wifi: rtw88: coex: add the RTL8723BS scan antenna workaround luka.gejak
2026-07-27  7:58   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:44     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] wifi: rtw88: coex: reassert the antenna path when associating luka.gejak
2026-07-27  8:21   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:44     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] wifi: rtw88: sdio: track free TX pages and OQT credits for RTL8723BS luka.gejak
2026-07-27  8:52   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:45     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] wifi: rtw88: sdio: set up RX aggregation and interrupts " luka.gejak
2026-07-27  8:59   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:45     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] wifi: rtw88: sdio: add TX back-pressure and retry on page starvation luka.gejak
2026-07-27  9:21   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:45     ` luka.gejak
2026-07-30  9:02       ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] wifi: rtw88: record beacons from the target BSSID before authenticating luka.gejak
2026-07-27  9:27   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:45     ` luka.gejak [this message]
2026-07-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] wifi: rtw88: run the RTL8723BS association register sequence luka.gejak
2026-07-27  9:33   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-07-30  7:45     ` luka.gejak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260730074504.19725-9-luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.