From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2433164B7; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785435466; cv=none; b=XdFY1uxpXeUcttAOckAItSjWekoOFy0stSKdRq//6p42w8Fq0sCp7fC3DqeLCAll5AU8FabELgflP93nSLjgVrquKOxzk1neWvv3NwBr6Jy2ZcXUspyWW6zLfBEnj6pZcaog+77wgj86fbr5R/IWegPPE1PYkyIQS/Lmr6H1/Vk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785435466; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Snwv4ZX9n7rsHVFGJZZarZQi0g4FUtW3ValMoH96bV0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=YEHdXpaZRRZckcmpXjhX/281iIyz9ATzMiNaxFt3Go5/o3Bi6jhCXCAwx6LA9nxBBDQAR4PDembkkLB8vWv+CPlJycVomvEs1CpS0cSELJXRP2QMFUpRvdEHZKXvnQGKxoqdhjfd9C0iOtefpLsqXFrPvbg+G2dmC0dXMK7cH3A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fuXCm1mL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fuXCm1mL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86F6F1F000E9; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:17:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785435464; bh=6R6dAzebd0lU5AFh1vm8XcRfXETiBlUdRxOXlhLQ9dU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=fuXCm1mLoqc5U3HXHSVUiHIjwDassHB8iSnSwNq4WhbmdXls3Z/2rBcJQQryry0MQ d0/5PoQ4wY1kXlywpxQCvpsKPiMhJPYwXdKaTtnn4ZkrDnUy/qUhdtciMN4bkCWUB2 UxyJhIaQl4tedm4dCpOaRXe2lNKkO7HwUeOlA7P4jjJE59v1utLBeKnNEzjeVX6J9J rddw/X8gRdnv87M//z/5Vi15Mrs9YHzBlWvHxQG70tqI5fSchBSokpp/u0pHWO2vM2 VzXYjm0e9qd9kJ3V7eR3+yo5W1sbmCjfCPjDRm1umjoiaj1J5PuVngngXMpH3w1+dj Pg9O90dBhysgg== From: Miguel Ojeda To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: achill@achill.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, broonie@kernel.org, conor@kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, hargar@microsoft.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, pavel@nabladev.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, shuah@kernel.org, sr@sladewatkins.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Miguel Ojeda , Joel Fernandes , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/675] 6.18.42-rc1 review Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 20:17:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20260730181717.95457-1-ojeda@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260730141445.110192266@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20260730141445.110192266@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:05:30 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.42 release. > There are 675 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:13:45 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested for loongarch64 and arm32: Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda I detected in the middle of the build lines like: find: 'lib': No such file or directory It looks like we need: ee8bfb15d02d ("drm: drop lib from header search path.") to go together with the one that was backported: 5e7b3c10420e ("gpu: Move DRM buddy allocator one level up (part two)") Having said that, there is something going on a bit confusing: commits "part one" (4a9671a03f2b) and "part two" (ba110db8e1bc) in mainline seem to have been merged into just the "part two" above in this -rc. Is that intentional? I am asking because the original removal of the `lib` folder happened in "part one" in mainline, so I was expecting to have to point to that one above, but it doesn't exist on its own. Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: David Airlie Cc: Simona Vetter Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org I hope that helps & thanks! Cheers, Miguel