All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
Subject: [riscv:for-next 17/18] arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:380:24: error: 'check_vector_unaligned_access' undeclared; did you mean 'check_unaligned_access'?
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:25:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git for-next
head:   03ececaea90889587dac37c802f02a1ea8b61d51
commit: d91f147112ba46e443aac2d45777824362365dcb [17/18] riscv: unaligned: stop using kthread for check_vector_unaligned_access()
config: riscv-randconfig-002-20260730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260730/202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260730/202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c: In function 'check_unaligned_access_all_cpus':
>> arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:380:24: error: 'check_vector_unaligned_access' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'check_unaligned_access'?
     380 |   schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access);
         |                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                        check_unaligned_access
   arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:380:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
   At top level:
   arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:291:13: warning: 'check_unaligned_access_speed' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     291 | static void check_unaligned_access_speed(struct work_struct *work __always_unused)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +380 arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c

   345	
   346	static int __init check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
   347	{
   348		int cpu;
   349	
   350		unaligned_access_init();
   351	
   352		if (unaligned_scalar_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_UNKNOWN) {
   353			pr_info("scalar unaligned access speed set to '%s' (%lu) by command line\n",
   354				speed_str[unaligned_scalar_speed_param], unaligned_scalar_speed_param);
   355			for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
   356				per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) = unaligned_scalar_speed_param;
   357		} else if (!check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus()) {
   358			check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus();
   359		}
   360	
   361		if (unaligned_vector_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN) {
   362			if (!has_vector() &&
   363			    unaligned_vector_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED) {
   364				pr_warn("vector support is not available, ignoring unaligned_vector_speed=%s\n",
   365					speed_str[unaligned_vector_speed_param]);
   366			} else {
   367				pr_info("vector unaligned access speed set to '%s' (%lu) by command line\n",
   368					speed_str[unaligned_vector_speed_param], unaligned_vector_speed_param);
   369			}
   370		}
   371	
   372		if (!has_vector())
   373			unaligned_vector_speed_param = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED;
   374	
   375		if (unaligned_vector_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN) {
   376			for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
   377				per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) = unaligned_vector_speed_param;
   378		} else if (!check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus() &&
   379			   IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) {
 > 380			schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access);
   381		}
   382	
   383		/*
   384		 * Setup hotplug callbacks for any new CPUs that come online or go
   385		 * offline.
   386		 */
   387		cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online",
   388					  riscv_online_cpu, riscv_offline_cpu);
   389		cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online",
   390					  riscv_online_cpu_vec, NULL);
   391	
   392		cpus_read_lock();
   393		modify_unaligned_access_branches(cpu_online_mask);
   394		cpus_read_unlock();
   395	
   396		return 0;
   397	}
   398	

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.