From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
Subject: [riscv:for-next 17/18] arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:380:24: error: 'check_vector_unaligned_access' undeclared; did you mean 'check_unaligned_access'?
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:25:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git for-next
head: 03ececaea90889587dac37c802f02a1ea8b61d51
commit: d91f147112ba46e443aac2d45777824362365dcb [17/18] riscv: unaligned: stop using kthread for check_vector_unaligned_access()
config: riscv-randconfig-002-20260730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260730/202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260730/202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c: In function 'check_unaligned_access_all_cpus':
>> arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:380:24: error: 'check_vector_unaligned_access' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'check_unaligned_access'?
380 | schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| check_unaligned_access
arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:380:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
At top level:
arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c:291:13: warning: 'check_unaligned_access_speed' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
291 | static void check_unaligned_access_speed(struct work_struct *work __always_unused)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +380 arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
345
346 static int __init check_unaligned_access_all_cpus(void)
347 {
348 int cpu;
349
350 unaligned_access_init();
351
352 if (unaligned_scalar_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_UNKNOWN) {
353 pr_info("scalar unaligned access speed set to '%s' (%lu) by command line\n",
354 speed_str[unaligned_scalar_speed_param], unaligned_scalar_speed_param);
355 for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
356 per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu) = unaligned_scalar_speed_param;
357 } else if (!check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus()) {
358 check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus();
359 }
360
361 if (unaligned_vector_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN) {
362 if (!has_vector() &&
363 unaligned_vector_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED) {
364 pr_warn("vector support is not available, ignoring unaligned_vector_speed=%s\n",
365 speed_str[unaligned_vector_speed_param]);
366 } else {
367 pr_info("vector unaligned access speed set to '%s' (%lu) by command line\n",
368 speed_str[unaligned_vector_speed_param], unaligned_vector_speed_param);
369 }
370 }
371
372 if (!has_vector())
373 unaligned_vector_speed_param = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNSUPPORTED;
374
375 if (unaligned_vector_speed_param != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_UNKNOWN) {
376 for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
377 per_cpu(vector_misaligned_access, cpu) = unaligned_vector_speed_param;
378 } else if (!check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus() &&
379 IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_VECTOR_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) {
> 380 schedule_on_each_cpu(check_vector_unaligned_access);
381 }
382
383 /*
384 * Setup hotplug callbacks for any new CPUs that come online or go
385 * offline.
386 */
387 cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online",
388 riscv_online_cpu, riscv_offline_cpu);
389 cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "riscv:online",
390 riscv_online_cpu_vec, NULL);
391
392 cpus_read_lock();
393 modify_unaligned_access_branches(cpu_online_mask);
394 cpus_read_unlock();
395
396 return 0;
397 }
398
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202607302206.qIdQdDcn-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.