All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
	iii@linux.ibm.com, gimm78064@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: verify zext_dst annotations for various instructions
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:07:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-static-zext-v1-5-98a4dc73e94b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-static-zext-v1-0-98a4dc73e94b@gmail.com>

Includes the following test cases:
- a test showing that zero extension flags do not propagate through
  state pruning in the unpatched kernel.
- a 32-bit ALU result read as 64-bit (zext) and read only as 32-bit
  (no zext);
- a 64-bit MOV (never zext'ed);
- a narrow (32-bit) BPF_LDX load whose result is read as 64-bit;
- 32-bit atomic fetch_add and cmpxchg whose result is read as 64-bit;
- a CFG case where a 32-bit definition's upper half is used only on one
  of two branches;
- no zext for dead registers;
- LD_ABS defines only lower 32 bits, hence needs zext when the result
  is used as 64-bits;
- Helper and subprogram parameters are considered to use full 64 bits;
- kfunc parameters are read according to their BTF type width.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c |   2 +
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_zext.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 262 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index be97f6887f0e..fba562c81969 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@
 #include "verifier_jit_inline.skel.h"
 #include "irq.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_ctx_ptr_param.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_zext.skel.h"
 
 #define MAX_ENTRIES 11
 
@@ -277,6 +278,7 @@ void test_irq(void)			      { RUN(irq); }
 void test_verifier_mtu(void)		      { RUN(verifier_mtu); }
 void test_verifier_jit_inline(void)               { RUN(verifier_jit_inline); }
 void test_verifier_ctx_ptr_param(void)       { RUN(verifier_ctx_ptr_param); }
+void test_verifier_zext(void)                 { RUN_TESTS(verifier_zext); }
 
 static int init_test_val_map(struct bpf_object *obj, char *map_name)
 {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_zext.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_zext.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b4c82a31e668
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_zext.c
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "../../../include/linux/filter.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("socket")
+__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
+__flag(BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32)
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void zext_lost_across_checkpoint(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("									\
+	call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];							\
+	r8 = r0;									\
+	r6 = 0xdeadbeefcafebabe ll;	/* inject some value for r6's upper half */	\
+	if r8 != 0 goto 1f;		/* fall-through cached first, branch pruned */	\
+	r6 = 32;			/* full 64-bit def */				\
+	goto 2f;									\
+1:											\
+	w6 = 32;			/* 32-bit def, zext mark lost */		\
+2:											\
+	r0 = r6;			/* buggy verifier believed upper 32 bits are 0 */ \
+					/* and thus did not zero extended w6 = 32. */	\
+	r0 >>= 32;									\
+	exit;										\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* 32-bit ALU result read as 64-bit -> zext */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("w1 = w0{{ +}}; zext")
+__naked void zext_alu32_hi_used(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	w1 = w0;					\
+	r0 = r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* 32-bit ALU result read only as 32-bit -> no zext */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__not_msg("w1 = w0{{.*}}; zext")
+__not_msg("w2 = w1{{.*}}; zext")
+__naked void no_zext_alu32_hi_unused(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	w1 = w0;					\
+	w2 = w1;					\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* 64-bit definition is never zero extended */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__not_msg("r1 = r0{{.*}}; zext")
+__naked void no_zext_mov64(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	r1 = r0;					\
+	r0 = r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* Narrow load result read as 64-bit -> zext */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -8){{ +}}; zext")
+__naked void zext_narrow_load_hi_used(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r0;				\
+	r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 8);				\
+	r0 = r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* 32-bit atomic fetch result read as 64-bit -> zext */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("r1 = atomic_fetch_add((u32 *)(r10 -8), r1){{ +}}; zext")
+__naked void zext_atomic_fetch32_hi_used(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;				\
+	w1 = 1;						\
+	.8byte %[fetch_add32];				\
+	r0 = r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_insn(fetch_add32,
+		     BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* 32-bit atomic cmpxchg result (r0) read as 64-bit -> zext */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("r0 = atomic_cmpxchg((u32 *)(r10 -8), r0, r1){{ +}}; zext")
+__naked void zext_cmpxchg32_hi_used(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r1 = 0;						\
+	*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;				\
+	w0 = 0;						\
+	w1 = 1;						\
+	.8byte %[cmpxchg32];				\
+	r2 = r0;					\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_insn(cmpxchg32,
+		     BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_1, -8))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* 32-bit def before a branch, upper half used on one branch -> zext */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("w6 = 32{{ +}}; zext")
+__naked void zext_cfg_hi_used_one_branch(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	w6 = 32;					\
+	if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = r6;					\
+	exit;						\
+l0_%=:							\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* r1's upper half is dead, so 'w1 = 1' must NOT be marked for zero extension. */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__not_msg("w1 = 1{{.*}}; zext")
+__naked void no_zext_other_reg_hi_used(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	r6 = r0;					\
+	r6 <<= 32;					\
+	w1 = 1;						\
+	r0 = r6;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* LD_ABS defines r0; when r0 is read as 64-bit it must be zero extended */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("r0 = *(u8 *)skb[0]{{.*}}; zext")
+__naked void zext_ld_abs_hi_used(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r6 = r1;					\
+	r0 = *(u8 *)skb[0];				\
+	r7 = r0;					\
+	r0 = r7;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* Helper parameters are read as 64-bit (call_use_mask() fallback) */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("w2 = 1{{ +}}; zext")
+__naked void helper_param_read_as_64bit(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r1 = r10;					\
+	r1 += -8;					\
+	w2 = 1;						\
+	call %[bpf_trace_printk];			\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_trace_printk)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+static __used __naked int subprog_reads_arg_as_64bit(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = r1;					\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* subprogram parameters are conservatively read as 64-bit */
+SEC("socket")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__msg("w1 = w0{{ +}}; zext")
+__naked void subprog_param_read_as_64bit(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];			\
+	w1 = w0;					\
+	call subprog_reads_arg_as_64bit;		\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+extern long bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d) __ksym;
+
+/* Force kfunc extern BTF generation. */
+int __kfunc_btf_root(void)
+{
+	return bpf_kfunc_call_test4(0, 0, 0, 0);
+}
+
+/* kfunc parameters are read according to their BTF type width */
+SEC("tc")
+__success __log_level(2)
+__not_msg("w3 = 1{{.*}}; zext")		/* int c  -> read as 32-bit */
+__msg("w4 = 1{{ +}}; zext")		/* long d -> read as 64-bit */
+__naked void kfunc_param_read_per_btf(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	w1 = 1;						\
+	w2 = 1;						\
+	w3 = 1;						\
+	w4 = 1;						\
+	call bpf_kfunc_call_test4;			\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";

-- 
2.55.0

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 19:07 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: infer zext_dst based on static register liveness analysis Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-31 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: do not print a newline after disassembly in bpf_verbose_insn() Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-31 20:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-31 21:12     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-31 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: track upper 32-bit register halves' liveness in compute_live_registers() Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-31 19:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf: infer zext_dst based on static register liveness analysis Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-31 19:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 21:17     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-31 19:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf: simplify the bpf_is_reg64() signature Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-31 19:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 20:09   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-31 19:07 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731-static-zext-v1-5-98a4dc73e94b@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gimm78064@gmail.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.