From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA4E220F2A; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785481049; cv=none; b=K2DSS/vkhv/aorsJA3B5Ewp1shtnaWiEvQMfjMCO6+gtFug+HczmuhLeQgrTm90UcgJDzasv7uvfd5zouvc9kiSgP0GcZiJyGcxRPY6nuY+D/95qGjO59DnesOcAm1pPk8HA3Tb3NQjvT1mBVhmc4Wn4rfZ29ckk1meJiV9F1KQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785481049; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kgMfG7+XKnN8FkNeC+WFR+A2vwomF1DP930mQ8Em2Ws=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Vxk9bJM7g8aF1C67s6ONGhZ1WBvTASPewvfn896RO+4cohOUCCpT8Lrjy1MiqW9EQnCiSl74j9P3ix9jeMgdGSS9BY98+bQxyHBzQgP1NABawJsfMg5KE3ns9+TsaRsE6HLWaR6Zi/Ft0PHoH+10StXxo9AH2+sAIeQFwAlnnGg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=YwVsiwOn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="YwVsiwOn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 363AF1F000E9; Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:57:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1785481047; bh=r7y8VIynFCQHZDQCckL6hl6AfuEFGx1T8F3uIT1Oe74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=YwVsiwOnsvhGApnpL8F7/m32g24kkCSvv3TJzuMoFnAM4OAmxlYGJB3JIc+1+IEfj XKxWUZL9/oE19g9GxwR2r2XLx5GI1UW/t24gvn3d1jjjaD/izpuzatoXGj5JTndkAL ESUEQ2RPBh1om2SsQuJRRDGReoFnlp/EyPABjhCY= Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 08:57:05 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: achill@achill.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, broonie@kernel.org, conor@kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, hargar@microsoft.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, pavel@nabladev.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, shuah@kernel.org, sr@sladewatkins.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Joel Fernandes , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/675] 6.18.42-rc1 review Message-ID: <2026073106-ajar-mantis-9f4e@gregkh> References: <20260730141445.110192266@linuxfoundation.org> <20260730181717.95457-1-ojeda@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260730181717.95457-1-ojeda@kernel.org> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 08:17:17PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:05:30 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.42 release. > > There are 675 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:13:45 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested > for loongarch64 and arm32: > > Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda > > I detected in the middle of the build lines like: > > find: 'lib': No such file or directory > > It looks like we need: > > ee8bfb15d02d ("drm: drop lib from header search path.") > > to go together with the one that was backported: > > 5e7b3c10420e ("gpu: Move DRM buddy allocator one level up (part two)") > > Having said that, there is something going on a bit confusing: commits > "part one" (4a9671a03f2b) and "part two" (ba110db8e1bc) in mainline seem > to have been merged into just the "part two" above in this -rc. Is that > intentional? I am asking because the original removal of the `lib` > folder happened in "part one" in mainline, so I was expecting to have to > point to that one above, but it doesn't exist on its own. > > Cc: Joel Fernandes > Cc: David Airlie > Cc: Simona Vetter > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Odd, looks like Sasha did it in one backport instead of two, perhaps because we wanted a real patch and not a "move" patch? Anyway, I'll go take the fixup change now too, thanks! greg k-h