From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jia Jia" <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost/vsock: discard IOTLB when ACCESS_PLATFORM is cleared
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 10:56:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731105651.CE9B41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731103414.1746316-2-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] A NULL pointer dereference occurs in translate_desc() if both dev->iotlb and dev->umem are NULL when a descriptor is processed.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost/vsock: discard IOTLB when ACCESS_PLATFORM is cleared ---
commit 711b531d8532907f465c4af9ee082250c352dc13
Author: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
vhost/vsock: discard IOTLB when ACCESS_PLATFORM is cleared
This patch detaches the IOTLB before acknowledging a feature mask without
ACCESS_PLATFORM to prevent stale translations. It clears the device and
virtqueue IOTLB pointers while holding virtqueue mutexes to ensure kick
handlers do not observe mixed translation states.
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index 9aaab6bb8061c..562b9e139a76f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -851,6 +851,34 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_cid(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 guest_cid)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Caller must hold the device mutex. */
> +static void vhost_vsock_clear_iotlb(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
> +{
> + struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++)
> + mutex_lock_nested(&vsock->vqs[i].mutex, i);
> +
> + iotlb = vsock->dev.iotlb;
> + vsock->dev.iotlb = NULL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++) {
> + vq = &vsock->vqs[i];
> + vq->iotlb = NULL;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by clearing dev->iotlb and vq->iotlb to
NULL here, does this expose a NULL pointer dereference in translate_desc()
if dev->umem was never initialized?
If userspace configures the vrings and kicks the virtqueue without ever
calling VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE, dev->umem remains NULL. When
vhost_vsock_clear_iotlb() clears dev->iotlb, the next descriptor
translation could trigger this path:
drivers/vhost/vhost.c:translate_desc() {
...
struct vhost_iotlb *umem = dev->iotlb ? dev->iotlb : dev->umem;
...
while ((u64)len > s) {
...
map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(umem, addr, last);
drivers/vhost/iotlb.c:vhost_iotlb_itree_first() {
return vhost_iotlb_itree_iter_first(&iotlb->root, start, last);
}
Because umem is NULL, taking the address of iotlb->root passes NULL to the
interval tree iterator, which would cause a page fault when dereferenced.
Can a malicious guest or unprivileged userspace process trigger this by
negotiating VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM, avoiding VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE, and
then clearing the feature bit dynamically?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731103414.1746316-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 4:09 [PATCH] vhost/vsock: prevent stale IOTLB after ACCESS_PLATFORM changes Jia Jia
2026-07-30 4:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 13:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-07-30 14:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-30 14:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-31 4:41 ` Jia Jia
2026-07-31 9:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-31 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost/vsock: fix device IOTLB feature lifecycle Jia Jia
2026-07-31 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost/vsock: discard IOTLB when ACCESS_PLATFORM is cleared Jia Jia
2026-07-31 10:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-31 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost/vsock: keep IOTLB across feature updates Jia Jia
2026-07-31 11:03 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731105651.CE9B41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.