All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stefan Haberland" <sth@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/17] s390/dasd: Extend prepare_itcw() to support WRITE_FULL_TRACK
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:21:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731162123.9CC521F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731153842.1729627-9-sth@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] The explicit assignment `lredata->length = 0` for `WRITE_FULL_TRACK` is unconditionally overwritten.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Lockless access to `conf.ned` and `uid.type` in I/O submission paths races with concurrent path events, leading to a NULL pointer dereference.
--

--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v5 08/17] s390/dasd: Extend prepare_itcw() to support WRITE_FULL_TRACK ---
commit 2948648b7fc2c93cb4193e7c55bd961de4d7e8c2
Author: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>

s390/dasd: Extend prepare_itcw() to support WRITE_FULL_TRACK
    
prepare_itcw() builds the FCX prefix block (PFX + LRE) for track-mode
I/O. Extend it to handle DASD_ECKD_CCW_WRITE_FULL_TRACK.

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> index 2f6d97c06237b..c1a26485f506d 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> @@ -4397,26 +4399,31 @@ static int prepare_itcw(struct itcw *itcw,
[ ... ]
> -	pfxdata.format = 1; /* PFX with LRE */
> -	pfxdata.base_address = basepriv->conf.ned->unit_addr;
> -	pfxdata.base_lss = basepriv->conf.ned->ID;
> -	pfxdata.validity.define_extent = 1;
> +	pfxdata->format = 1; /* PFX with LRE */
> +	pfxdata->base_address = basepriv->conf.ned->unit_addr;
> +	pfxdata->base_lss = basepriv->conf.ned->ID;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this lockless access to conf.ned lead
to a NULL pointer dereference?

If a concurrent path event triggers dasd_eckd_pe_handler(), it calls
rebuild_device_uid(), which then calls dasd_eckd_identify_conf_parts().
That function transiently sets conf.ned = NULL without holding any locks.

If prepare_itcw() accesses basepriv->conf.ned->unit_addr at that moment, it
will dereference a NULL pointer.

> +	pfxdata->validity.define_extent = 1;
>  
>  	/* private uid is kept up to date, conf_data may be outdated */
>  	if (startpriv->uid.type == UA_BASE_PAV_ALIAS)

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does accessing uid.type here race with a
concurrent memset?

The create_uid() function memsets the uid to 0 under the ccwdev_lock, but this
I/O submission path reads startpriv->uid.type locklessly, exposing it to
transient zeroes.

> -		pfxdata.validity.verify_base = 1;
> +		pfxdata->validity.verify_base = 1;
[ ... ]
> @@ -4446,7 +4453,39 @@ static int prepare_itcw(struct itcw *itcw,
[ ... ]
> +	case DASD_ECKD_CCW_WRITE_FULL_TRACK:
> +		dedata->mask.perm = 0x3;
> +		dedata->mask.auth = 0x00;
> +		dedata->attributes.operation = basepriv->attrib.operation;
> +		dedata->blk_size = blksize;
> +		dedata->ga_extended |= 0x42;
> +		rc = set_timestamp(NULL, dedata, basedev);
> +		lredata->operation.orientation = 0x0;
> +		lredata->operation.operation = 0x3F;
> +		lredata->extended_operation = 0x11;
> +		lredata->auxiliary.check_bytes = 0x2;
> +		lredata->length = 0;

[Severity: Medium]
Will this lredata->length value be unconditionally overwritten?

Later in prepare_itcw(), there is this assignment:

    lredata->length = tlf;

If WRITE_FULL_TRACK is used with a non-zero transfer length factor, the
tlf value will overwrite the explicitly requested 0.

> +		lredata->extended_parameter_length = 0x02;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260731153842.1729627-1-sth@linux.ibm.com?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 15:38 [PATCH v5 00/17] s390/dasd: ESE thin-provisioning performance improvements Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] s390/dasd: Propagate partial completion length across ERP recovery Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 15:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] s390/dasd: Guard sysfs discipline callbacks against unallocated private data Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 15:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] s390/dasd: Optimize max blocks per request for track alignment Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 15:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] s390/dasd: Use GFP_KERNEL in dasd_alloc_device() Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 15:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] s390/dasd: Add defines for the Extended Address Volume track address Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 15:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] s390/dasd: Add infrastructure for ESE full-track write Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] s390/dasd: Add range-based format-track collision detection Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] s390/dasd: Extend prepare_itcw() to support WRITE_FULL_TRACK Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:21   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] s390/dasd: Add dasd_eckd_build_cp_tpm_writefulltrack() Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] s390/dasd: Use WRITE_FULL_TRACK in ESE format handler Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] s390/dasd: Add full_track_bias to control fulltrack write mode Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] s390/dasd: Derive adaptive ESE fulltrack heuristic from ft_bias Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] s390/dasd: Stamp a format label into newly formatted volumes Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] s390/dasd: Detect ESE volumes from the on-disk format label Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] s390/dasd: Report ESE capability and format mode at device online Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] s390/dasd: Re-enable discard support for ESE volumes Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-31 15:38 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] s390/dasd: Read cached unit address and LSS in the CCW build path Stefan Haberland
2026-07-31 16:58   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731162123.9CC521F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.