From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stefan Haberland" <sth@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 16/18] s390/dasd: Report ESE capability and format mode at device online
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 11:45:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260801114537.1D5B01F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260801111008.3391031-17-sth@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Lockless reading of partially updated `dasd_format_label` causes a data race and potential torn read in sysfs.
--
--- Patch [16]: [PATCH v6 16/18] s390/dasd: Report ESE capability and format mode at device online ---
commit 1bb0c0f3e976fb237f52d951feaeac8bfd58702e
Author: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>
s390/dasd: Report ESE capability and format mode at device online
This commit extends the device information line logged when a volume comes
online with the ESE hardware capability and the on-disk format mode. The
format mode is derived from the on-disk format label.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> index 35a970e006fd0..643eb7882f9cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
> @@ -2608,15 +2609,29 @@ static int dasd_eckd_end_analysis(struct dasd_block *block)
> private->rdc_data.trk_per_cyl *
> blk_per_trk);
>
> + /*
> + * Report the ESE hardware capability and the format mode. The mode
> + * comes from dasd_eckd_on_demand_format() (the on-disk label, or the
> + * ESE state when no label is present), matching the on_demand_formatting
> + * sysfs attribute.
> + */
> + ese_str = dasd_eckd_ese_capable(device) ? ", ESE" : "";
> + fmt_str = "";
> + if (dasd_eckd_on_demand_format(device))
[Severity: Medium]
Could calling dasd_eckd_on_demand_format() locklessly result in a data race
and a potential torn read?
When reading from sysfs, or here in dasd_eckd_end_analysis(), we read the
label without locks:
drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c:dasd_eckd_on_demand_format() {
...
if (private->ese_label_valid)
return !!(private->ese_label.flags & DASD_ESE_LABEL_F_QUICK);
...
}
However, other paths overwrite the label locklessly. This happens during
the format ioctl:
drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c:dasd_eckd_fill_format_label() {
...
private->ese_label = *label;
private->ese_label_valid = true;
...
}
It also happens during device probe:
drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c:dasd_eckd_read_format_label() {
...
private->ese_label = *label;
private->ese_label_valid = true;
...
}
If a user repeatedly reads the sysfs attribute (or this device online path
is executed) while concurrently running a format ioctl, could this cause a
torn read that returns a corrupted or uninitialized boolean value?
> + fmt_str = ", on-demand format";
> + else if (dasd_eckd_ese_capable(device))
> + fmt_str = ", full format";
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260801111008.3391031-1-sth@linux.ibm.com?part=16
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-01 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 11:09 [PATCH v6 00/18] s390/dasd: ESE thin-provisioning performance improvements Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] s390/dasd: Do not complete a failed ESE read as successful Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] s390/dasd: Propagate partial completion length across ERP recovery Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] s390/dasd: Guard sysfs discipline callbacks against unallocated private data Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] s390/dasd: Optimize max blocks per request for track alignment Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] s390/dasd: Use GFP_KERNEL in dasd_alloc_device() Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] s390/dasd: Add defines for the Extended Address Volume track address Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] s390/dasd: Add infrastructure for ESE full-track write Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] s390/dasd: Add range-based format-track collision detection Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:09 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] s390/dasd: Extend prepare_itcw() to support WRITE_FULL_TRACK Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] s390/dasd: Add dasd_eckd_build_cp_tpm_writefulltrack() Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] s390/dasd: Use WRITE_FULL_TRACK in ESE format handler Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] s390/dasd: Add full_track_bias to control fulltrack write mode Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] s390/dasd: Derive adaptive ESE fulltrack heuristic from ft_bias Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] s390/dasd: Stamp a format label into newly formatted volumes Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] s390/dasd: Detect ESE volumes from the on-disk format label Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] s390/dasd: Report ESE capability and format mode at device online Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] s390/dasd: Re-enable discard support for ESE volumes Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] s390/dasd: Read cached unit address and LSS in the CCW build path Stefan Haberland
2026-08-01 11:49 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260801114537.1D5B01F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.