From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 09:06:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802090622.399B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802-n-dts-style-checker-continued-v2-8-6c5dbd1ccfe4@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The selftest runner `scripts/dtc/dt-style-selftest/run.sh` was not updated to test `good/` fixtures against the newly added `stricter` mode.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v2 08/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode ---
commit 9aebf208f76b608e7a3091f58903f2279782a0e4
Author: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode
Two rules, which are enabled in 'strict' mode make little sense for DTS:
1. line-length, limiting length of line to 80 characters: DTS often has
a bit longer lines, especially for interconnects or heavily nested
opp-level. Checkpatch already does not warn for exceeding 80
characters.
2. unused-labels, discouraging unused labels in DTS or YAML (not DTSI or
DTSO): while not harming this leads to many false positives, e.g.
unused PMIC regulators in DTS.
Introduce another 'mode' of running beside existing relaxed and strict:
a 'stricter' one where these two rules are moved for DTS. Intention is
to have in-tree DTS passing 'strict' mode.
> diff --git a/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style b/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style
> index 54e96ce04b209..56d8d0c217f20 100755
> --- a/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style
> +++ b/scripts/dtc/dt-check-style
> @@ -5,12 +5,14 @@
> # .dts/.dtsi/.dtso source files. Enforces rules from
> # Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst.
> #
> -# Two modes:
> +# Three modes:
> # --mode=relaxed (default)
> # Only rules that produce zero warnings on the current tree.
> # Suitable for dt_binding_check.
> # --mode=strict
> -# All rules. Required for new submissions.
> +# Most of the rules. Required for new submissions.
> +# --mode=stricter
> +# All rules, including ones having false positives.
[Severity: Medium]
Should the selftest runner be updated to cover this newly added mode?
Looking at scripts/dtc/dt-style-selftest/run.sh, the loop for testing good
fixtures still only iterates over relaxed and strict modes:
scripts/dtc/dt-style-selftest/run.sh:
# good/ -- must exit 0 and produce no output in both modes
for f in "$here"/good/*; do
[ -e "$f" ] || continue
for mode in relaxed strict; do
out=$(run "$f" "$mode")
This leaves the newly added stricter mode untested against valid fixtures,
and leaves the script comment referring to "both modes" out of date.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802-n-dts-style-checker-continued-v2-0-6c5dbd1ccfe4@oss.qualcomm.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 8:45 [PATCH v2 00/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Improvements for false positives Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Add missing /dts-v1/ to few test cases Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Simplify setting depth of DtsLine Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Handle root node in overlays Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 9:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Handle sorting of top-level nodes and properties Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Drop stray backslash before quote for continuation-alignment Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Fix alignment of values in continued property lines Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Consistently call 'kind' as 'file_type' Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Introduce 'stricter' mode Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 9:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-02 10:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Add test for trailing white-space in DTS Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] dtc: dt-check-style: Add warning for redundant white-spaces Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-02 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] MAINTAINERS: dt-bindings: Include dt-check-style in DT binding entry Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260802090622.399B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.