From: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@linux.dev>
To: linux-yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org
Cc: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
Paul Barker <paul@pbarker.dev>,
Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>,
"Navuduri, Venkata Adhitya" <Venkata.Navuduri@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [yocto] linux-yocto CVEs in need of triage
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 07:33:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802143403.1178547-1-junjie.cao@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ac849a706feb16688020d5bcc3e74aececd63cf.camel@pbarker.dev>
Hi Paul,
I have independently triaged the CVEs on this list other than
CVE-2023-3640, which Adhitya already covered. For the seven with a
conclusive status I have sent a patch for cve-exclusion.inc to the
OE-core list ("cve-exclusion: set status for 7 kernel CVEs lacking
upstream fix data"). Summary of all verdicts below; every claimed
commit was verified against mainline history (linux-next 20260727),
and I note explicitly where a tie is my inference rather than a
distro/CNA statement.
Fixed upstream (nobody has connected the dots yet):
* CVE-2022-1247 (rose_connect() refcount race): actually fixed in
v6.17 by d860d1faa6b2 ("net: rose: convert 'use' field to
refcount_t") plus da9c9c877597, from Takamitsu Iwai's Aug-2025
series. The commit message describes the CVE's premise almost
verbatim ("The 'use' field in struct rose_neigh is used as a
reference counter but lacks atomicity") and the diff removes the
exact rose->neighbour->use++ in rose_connect(). Backported to
6.1.y/6.6.y/6.12.y/6.16.y in the 2025-09-02 stable round. The whole
rose/hamradio subsystem was then removed in v7.1 (dd8d4bc28ad7), so
>= v7.1 is unaffected by construction. Ubuntu/Debian/Red Hat
trackers all still show this as open - it may be worth feeding the
correction back to them. Caution: the two 2022 Duoming Zhou rose
patches referenced by Ubuntu's tracker fix different rose bugs and
are not this CVE's fix.
* CVE-2023-4010: the function named by the CVE (usb_giveback_urb())
does not exist in the kernel. The reporter's own PoC repo output
points at drivers/media/rc/imon.c: an unthrottled URB resubmit loop
producing a printk flood on -EPROTO (Ubuntu triage: "There is no
system lockup happening"). That loop was stopped by eecd203ada43
("media: imon: make send_packet() more robust") in v6.18. The commit
carries no CVE reference, so this tie is inferred - flagged as such
in the patch; treating it as "disputed" instead would also be
defensible.
No fix exists or is planned (proposed as upstream-wontfix/disputed in
the patch):
* CVE-2019-14899: weak host model property, config-only mitigations
(wg-quick ships a firewall rule); NVD CPE is unversioned so it can
never match a fixed version.
* CVE-2021-3714: KSM dedup side channel; Red Hat bz#1931327 CLOSED
WONTFIX. Note CONFIG_KSM=y is set in kernel-cache (intel-x86 BSP and
paravirt_kvm), but ksmd is off by default and pages must opt in via
MADV_MERGEABLE/PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE.
* CVE-2021-3864: setuid coredump LPE; the Waiman Long and Wander
Costa fix attempts (Dec 2021/Jan 2022) were rejected or fizzled and
the flagged fs/exec.c logic is unchanged today. Only exploitable
with a relative kernel.core_pattern; happy to drop this entry if you
would rather keep it visible for sysvinit images that ship the
kernel default "core" pattern.
* CVE-2022-0400 (net/smc OOB read): never substantiated - Red Hat
bz#2044575 CLOSED NOTABUG, SUSE bsc#1195329 RESOLVED INVALID, Debian
"non issue"; the originating report (bz#2040604) was never made
public and the CNA recorded no affected version.
* CVE-2022-4543 ("EntryBleed"): entry text is still cloned
_PAGE_GLOBAL into user page tables (arch/x86/mm/pti.c); upstream and
Debian position is that KASLR is not a boundary against local
attackers. One clarification worth recording since the two are often
confused: 97e3d26b5e5f ("x86/mm: Randomize per-cpu entry area",
v6.2) is the fix for the cpu_entry_area issue - i.e. CVE-2023-3640,
as Adhitya identified - and does not address EntryBleed, which leaks
the KASLR base via entry_SYSCALL_64 itself.
Genuinely unfixed - deliberately NOT added to cve-exclusion.inc, so
they stay visible in the metrics:
* CVE-2023-3397: real subsystem is JFS (txEnd()/lmLogClose() UAF),
not slub. The only proposed fix (lore
20230515095956.17898-1-zyytlz.wz@163.com) was withdrawn by its
author after review; the racy code is unchanged at HEAD and syzbot
was still reproducing slab-use-after-free in txEnd in June 2026.
* CVE-2023-6238 (NVMe passthrough metadata DMA overflow): a
mitigation ("nvme: remove unprivileged passthrough support",
20231016060519.231880-1-joshi.k@samsung.com) was applied to nvme-6.6
and then explicitly backed out by Keith Busch, over Christoph
Hellwig's objection ("We leave an exploitable hole in"); nothing
re-landed and nvme_map_user_request() still passes the user
meta_len through without an NLB*MS cross-check. One actionable
nuance: the exposure was introduced by 855b7717f44b in v6.2, so
linux-yocto branches < v6.2 (5.15, 6.1) are not affected - Debian
independently reached the same conclusion.
* CVE-2023-6240 ("Marvin" RSA timing oracle): nothing to do with
Marvell or s390; the leaky code is the generic
pkcs1pad_decrypt_complete() in crypto/rsa-pkcs1pad.c, which still
branches on secret-derived data at HEAD. Fixed only in RHEL
downstream (RHSA-2024:2758 etc.); Ubuntu notes "appears unfixed in
upstream as of 2024.08.24". Practical exposure needs a service
driving KEYCTL_PKEY_DECRYPT with a long-lived key, which is narrow,
but the primitive is present.
I kept CVE-2023-3640 out of the patch since Adhitya has it in hand;
the 4543-vs-3640 note above is just so the two KASLR CVEs don't get
cross-wired in the data later.
Happy to adjust any of the statuses or wording, and to help with the
wrynose/scarthgap backports once the master patch is settled.
Best regards,
Junjie Cao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 19:33 linux-yocto CVEs in need of triage Paul Barker
2026-07-22 14:45 ` [yocto] " Randy MacLeod
2026-07-23 12:15 ` Navuduri, Venkata Adhitya
2026-07-24 14:18 ` [OE-core] " Paul Barker
2026-08-02 14:33 ` Junjie Cao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260802143403.1178547-1-junjie.cao@linux.dev \
--to=junjie.cao@linux.dev \
--cc=Venkata.Navuduri@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul@pbarker.dev \
--cc=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
--cc=yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.