From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Esben Haabendal" <esben@geanix.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix error handling in sn65dsi83_reset_work()
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:21:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803152112.5CC281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803-ti-sn65dsi83-fixes-v3-2-9b403a405ccd@geanix.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Missing cancel_work_sync() for ctx->reset_work during driver teardown leads to a Use-After-Free.
- [High] Skipping enable_irq() on the error path causes an IRQ disable depth leak, leaving the interrupt permanently disabled.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix error handling in sn65dsi83_reset_work() ---
commit 58246b5ef131d7aeea7b5c2b693088e7255aa435
Author: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix error handling in sn65dsi83_reset_work()
This commit fixes the error path in sn65dsi83_reset_work() by adding a
goto to ensure drm_bridge_exit() is called when sn65dsi83_reset_pipe()
fails, safely closing the critical section.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> @@ -419,11 +419,12 @@ static void sn65dsi83_reset_work(struct work_struct *ws)
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this work function execute after
the device is unbound, resulting in a use-after-free?
If the driver is removed and devres frees the ctx structure, the work
could still be pending since sn65dsi83_remove() does not appear to call
cancel_work_sync() before returning:
sn65dsi83_remove() {
...
drm_bridge_unplug(&ctx->bridge);
// missing cancel_work_sync(&ctx->reset_work);
}
If the workqueue executes sn65dsi83_reset_work() after teardown,
dereferencing ctx for drm_bridge_enter() might access freed memory.
> ret = sn65dsi83_reset_pipe(ctx);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(ctx->dev, "reset pipe failed %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> - return;
> + goto err_exit;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but doesn't jumping to err_exit
here leave the interrupt permanently disabled?
If a hardware error triggers the IRQ handler, sn65dsi83_handle_errors()
calls disable_irq_nosync(), which increments the IRQ disable depth. By
skipping the enable_irq() call on this error path, the depth counter
remains unbalanced.
Would it be better to mask the interrupt source via hardware registers
on failure, and still call enable_irq() so the kernel's depth counter
remains balanced?
> }
> if (ctx->irq)
> enable_irq(ctx->irq);
>
> +err_exit:
> drm_bridge_exit(idx);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803-ti-sn65dsi83-fixes-v3-0-9b403a405ccd@geanix.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 14:57 [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Various fixes Esben Haabendal
2026-08-03 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Propagate error in sn65dsi83_reset_pipe() Esben Haabendal
2026-08-03 15:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 6:41 ` Esben Haabendal
2026-08-05 7:46 ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-08-05 7:56 ` Esben Haabendal
2026-08-03 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix error handling in sn65dsi83_reset_work() Esben Haabendal
2026-08-03 15:21 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-04 6:48 ` Esben Haabendal
2026-08-03 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Support LVDS Channel B on SN65DSI84 Esben Haabendal
2026-08-06 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Various fixes Luca Ceresoli
2026-08-06 9:20 ` Esben Haabendal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803152112.5CC281F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=esben@geanix.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.