All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v1 01/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:28:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803162827.719B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803160924.236807-2-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A malicious guest can trigger unbounded kernel stack recursion and host panic by providing a long chain of non-looping Transfer in Channel (TIC) CCWs.
--

--- Patch [1]: [GIT PULL v1 01/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails ---
commit 2ed68383152f2b2060167f3fc63cdb973d979950
Author: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>

s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails

This commit moves the ccwchain cleanup out of the recursive
ccwchain_handle_ccw() and ccwchain_loop_tic() logic into a new wrapper
function ccwchain_build_ccws(). This ensures that all segments allocated for
a channel program are freed if initialization fails.

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> index 7561aa7d3e017..086d1b54bdb05 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -455,9 +455,6 @@ static int ccwchain_handle_ccw(dma32_t cda, struct channel_program *cp)
>  	/* Loop for tics on this new chain. */
>  	ret = ccwchain_loop_tic(chain, cp);
>  

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this recursive call chain lead to
unbounded kernel stack consumption?

Looking at ccwchain_handle_ccw() and ccwchain_loop_tic(), they recursively
call each other:

ccwchain_handle_ccw()
   ccwchain_loop_tic()
      ccwchain_handle_ccw()

If a guest constructs a channel program with a long sequence of Transfer
in Channel (TIC) CCWs, where each points to a distinct guest physical
address, tic_target_chain_exists() will return false.

Does this allow an unprivileged guest to trigger unbounded recursion and
overflow the host kernel stack, resulting in a host panic?

> -	if (ret)
> -		ccwchain_free(chain);
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803160924.236807-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 16:09 [GIT PULL v1 00/23] KVM: s390: Misc KVM and vfio-ccw fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 01/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Free all memory if cp_init() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 02/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Limit the number of channel program segments Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 03/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Fix out of bounds check on CCW array Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 04/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Ensure first IDAW remains constant Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 05/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Calculate idal length based on idaw type Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 06/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Ensure index for read/write regions are within range Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 07/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Cancel existing workqueues Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 08/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Move cp cleanup out of not operational Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 09/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Selectively expand io_mutex Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 10/23] s390/vfio_ccw: Implement a crw lock Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 11/23] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 12/23] KVM: s390: Do not free SCA if it was not allocated Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 13/23] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 14/23] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 15/23] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Fix sca_clear_ext_call() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 16/23] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 17/23] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 18/23] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 19/23] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 20/23] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 21/23] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal is pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 22/23] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 16:09 ` [GIT PULL v1 23/23] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-08-03 17:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 13:48 ` [GIT PULL v1 00/23] KVM: s390: Misc KVM and vfio-ccw fixes Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803162827.719B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.