From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ilya Khomyakov" <khomyakovilya@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:29:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804152912.5DB251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804142831.4365-1-khomyakovilya@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The newly introduced `mpi3mr_sas_phy_bit` function uses `WARN_ON_ONCE` to validate firmware-provided PHY identifiers, which creates a kernel panic vector if `panic_on_warn` is enabled.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incorrect casting of `u64` bitmask to `unsigned long *` for `for_each_set_bit()` causes incorrect PHY IDs on 32-bit big-endian architectures, leading to array out-of-bounds access.
- [High] A malicious or compromised firmware can trigger a heap buffer overflow in `mpi3mr_refresh_sas_ports()` by providing a `num_phys` value greater than 64.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe ---
commit ceebecd676e904ef112074dffb72b70397933c87
Author: Ilya Khomyakov <khomyakovilya@gmail.com>
scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe
This patch fixes 64-bit PHY-mask handling in the Broadcom MPI3 Storage
Controller driver under drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/. It introduces helpers to avoid
undefined behavior when constructing 64-bit PHY masks using signed 32-bit shift
operations.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> index 240f67a8e2e3b..d6492dddf7352 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,42 @@
>
> #include "mpi3mr.h"
>
> +/**
> + * mpi3mr_sas_phy_bit - build a bit for a firmware PHY identifier
> + * @phy_id: Firmware PHY identifier to represent in a 64-bit port mask
> + *
> + * The port mask is a u64, so every shift must be performed in a 64-bit
> + * unsigned type. Reject identifiers that cannot be represented before the
> + * shift to avoid undefined behavior.
> + *
> + * Return: BIT_ULL(@phy_id) for a representable identifier, otherwise zero.
> + */
> +static u64 mpi3mr_sas_phy_bit(u8 phy_id)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(phy_id >= sizeof(u64) * 8))
> + return 0;
[Severity: High]
Can this allow malicious or buggy firmware to trigger a kernel panic?
The phy_id originates from the device firmware. If a compromised or buggy
device provides a num_phys >= 64, the driver iterates through these and passes
them to mpi3mr_sas_phy_bit(), triggering WARN_ON_ONCE().
Kernel guidelines prohibit using WARN_ON macros to validate external or
hardware-provided data because it allows an external entity to crash the
system via a Denial of Service if panic_on_warn is enabled.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1765,7 +1805,7 @@ mpi3mr_refresh_sas_ports(struct mpi3mr_ioc *mrioc)
> port_idx = host_port_count;
> h_port[port_idx].sas_address = le64_to_cpu(sasinf->sas_address);
> h_port[port_idx].handle = attached_handle;
> - h_port[port_idx].phy_mask = (1 << i);
> + h_port[port_idx].phy_mask = mpi3mr_sas_phy_bit(i);
> h_port[port_idx].iounit_port_id = sas_io_unit_pg0->phy_data[i].io_unit_port;
> h_port[port_idx].lowest_phy = sasinf->phy_num;
> h_port[port_idx].used = 0;
> host_port_count++;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can a malicious or compromised
firmware trigger a heap buffer overflow here by providing a num_phys value
greater than 64?
Earlier in mpi3mr_refresh_sas_ports(), h_port is allocated with a hardcoded
size of 64 elements on the heap:
h_port = kzalloc_objs(struct host_port, 64);
The loop that populates it iterates up to mrioc->sas_hba.num_phys, which is
parsed directly from the firmware's SAS IO Unit Page 0 (as an 8-bit value,
allowing up to 255).
If the firmware reports more than 64 phys and provides distinct attached
handles for them, host_port_count (tracked via port_idx) will exceed 63.
This directly results in unconstrained out-of-bounds heap writes when
initializing fields like h_port[port_idx].sas_address.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the incorrect casting in
mpi3mr_update_mr_sas_port() cause array out-of-bounds access on 32-bit
big-endian architectures?
drivers/scsi/mpi3mr/mpi3mr_transport.c:mpi3mr_update_mr_sas_port() {
...
for_each_set_bit(i, (ulong *) &phys_to_be_added, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) {
mr_sas_phy = &mrioc->sas_hba.phy[i];
...
}
In mpi3mr_update_mr_sas_port(), phys_to_be_added is a u64 bitmask. On 32-bit
big-endian systems, unsigned long is 32 bits, and the cast points to the
most significant 32 bits (bits 32-63) of the u64.
for_each_set_bit() processes this as bits 0-31, effectively swapping the
lower and upper halves of the 64-bit mask. If a PHY ID < 32 is set, it
will be interpreted as PHY ID >= 32, which causes out-of-bounds access
to dynamically allocated arrays like mrioc->sas_hba.phy.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804142831.4365-1-khomyakovilya@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 14:28 [PATCH] scsi: mpi3mr: make SAS port PHY masks 64-bit safe Ilya Khomyakov
2026-08-04 15:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-04 14:00 Ilya Khomyakov
2026-08-04 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804152912.5DB251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=khomyakovilya@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.