From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v6 03/10] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 18:26:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804172639.2844491-4-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804172639.2844491-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
Currently, rxrpc_send_data() updates call->tx_pending just before it
returns - but it won't be holding the call->lock when it does this if a
wait was interrupted by a signal. This would allow a parallel sendmsg() to
race.
Further, both the callers of rxrpc_send_data() call it with the lock held,
and then it returns an indication through the parameter list to say whether
it has dropped the lock or not - after which the callers both just drop the
lock if it's still held.
Fix this by:
(1) Moving the release of call->lock down into rxrpc_send_data() and get
rid of the indicator parameter. This makes it easier to see where the
lock is held.
(2) Make the wait_for_space path move the value in txb back into
call->tx_pending before dropping the lock prior to the wait.
(3) After waiting, if the attempt to reacquire the mutex is interrupted,
just return directly there rather than going to out_unlock
Fixes: b0f571ecd794 ("rxrpc: Fix locking in rxrpc's sendmsg")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702144919.172295-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 5ea10dc497a7..79fd31b02d11 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ static int rxrpc_alloc_txqueue(struct sock *sk, struct rxrpc_call *call)
static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
struct rxrpc_call *call,
struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
- rxrpc_notify_end_tx_t notify_end_tx,
- bool *_dropped_lock)
+ rxrpc_notify_end_tx_t notify_end_tx)
+ __releases(&call->user_mutex)
{
struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb;
struct sock *sk = &rx->sk;
@@ -334,12 +334,12 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
ret = rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected(call, &timeo);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto out_unlock;
if (call->conn->state == RXRPC_CONN_CLIENT_UNSECURED) {
ret = rxrpc_init_client_conn_security(call->conn);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
/* this should be in poll */
@@ -350,13 +350,15 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
trace_rxrpc_abort(call->debug_id, rxrpc_sendmsg_late_send,
call->cid, call->call_id, call->rx_consumed,
0, -EPROTO);
- return -EPROTO;
+ ret = -EPROTO;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
if (unlikely(test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_ERROR, &call->flags))) {
trace_rxrpc_abort(call->debug_id, rxrpc_sendmsg_tx_error,
call->cid, call->call_id, call->rx_consumed,
0, -EIO);
- return -EIO;
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
txb = call->tx_pending;
@@ -456,7 +458,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
if (ret == -ENOMEM)
goto maybe_error_rewind;
set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_TX_ERROR, &call->flags);
- goto out;
+ goto out_txb;
}
if (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)
@@ -468,15 +470,18 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
success:
ret = copied;
-out:
+out_txb:
call->tx_pending = txb;
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
_leave(" = %d", ret);
return ret;
call_terminated:
rxrpc_put_txbuf(txb, rxrpc_txbuf_put_send_aborted);
- _leave(" = %d", call->error);
- return call->error;
+ call->tx_pending = NULL;
+ ret = call->error;
+ goto out_unlock;
maybe_error_rewind:
/* If we got a retryable error after copying all the supplied data into
@@ -499,36 +504,40 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
if (rxrpc_call_is_complete(call) &&
call->error < 0) {
ret = call->error;
- goto out;
+ goto out_txb;
}
goto success;
}
- goto out;
+ goto out_txb;
efault:
ret = -EFAULT;
- goto out;
+ goto out_txb;
wait_for_space:
ret = -EAGAIN;
if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT)
goto maybe_error;
+ call->tx_pending = txb;
+ txb = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
- *_dropped_lock = true;
+
ret = rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window(rx, call, &timeo,
msg->msg_flags & MSG_WAITALL);
if (ret < 0)
- goto maybe_error;
+ goto out_nolock;
if (call->interruptibility == RXRPC_INTERRUPTIBLE) {
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&call->user_mutex) < 0) {
ret = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
- goto maybe_error;
+ goto out_nolock;
}
} else {
mutex_lock(&call->user_mutex);
}
- *_dropped_lock = false;
goto reload;
+out_nolock:
+ _leave(" = %d [intr]", ret);
+ return copied ?: ret;
}
/*
@@ -694,7 +703,6 @@ rxrpc_new_client_call_for_sendmsg(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct msghdr *msg,
int rxrpc_do_sendmsg(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
{
struct rxrpc_call *call;
- bool dropped_lock = false;
int ret;
struct rxrpc_send_params p = {
@@ -803,16 +811,15 @@ int rxrpc_do_sendmsg(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
ret = 0;
break;
case RXRPC_CMD_SEND_DATA:
- ret = rxrpc_send_data(rx, call, msg, len, NULL, &dropped_lock);
- break;
+ ret = rxrpc_send_data(rx, call, msg, len, NULL);
+ goto error_put;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
out_put_unlock:
- if (!dropped_lock)
- mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
error_put:
rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put_sendmsg);
_leave(" = %d", ret);
@@ -842,7 +849,6 @@ int rxrpc_kernel_send_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
rxrpc_notify_end_tx_t notify_end_tx)
{
- bool dropped_lock = false;
int ret;
_enter("{%d},", call->debug_id);
@@ -853,12 +859,10 @@ int rxrpc_kernel_send_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
mutex_lock(&call->user_mutex);
ret = rxrpc_send_data(rxrpc_sk(sock->sk), call, msg, len,
- notify_end_tx, &dropped_lock);
+ notify_end_tx);
if (ret == -ESHUTDOWN)
ret = call->error;
- if (!dropped_lock)
- mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
_leave(" = %d", ret);
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 17:26 [PATCH net v6 00/10] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 01/10] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 02/10] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 04/10] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 05/10] rxrpc: Expand abort trace enum David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 06/10] keys: Add refcounting to user-defined key type payload David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 07/10] afs: Create a server appdata key David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 08/10] rxrpc: Pass appdata key to rxrpc_call and thence to rxrpc_bundle David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 09/10] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet overqueuing and simplify RESPONSE generation David Howells
2026-08-04 17:26 ` [PATCH net v6 10/10] rxrpc: Remove OOB challenge/response code David Howells
2026-08-06 16:15 ` [PATCH net v6 00/10] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-08 1:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-17 20:19 ` David Howells
2026-08-17 21:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804172639.2844491-4-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.