From: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Fix a bug in pc_adjust_freq_bounds()
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 16:22:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804232218.1736159-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> (raw)
In cases where min frequency was actually greater than BMG_MIN_FREQ,
we were not using the updated min frequency as there was a missing
call to pc_action_query_task_state() between the two settings of
min frequency. Use the xe_guc_pc_get_min_freq_locked() variant to
obtain the frequency as a good practice, and cache the changed value
to fix this issue.
v2: pc->freq_ready is not set until after pc_adjust_freq_bounds(). Stay
with pc_action_query_task_state() instead.
Fixes: bdde16c9ac5c ("drm/xe/bmg: Update Wa_14022085890")
Signed-off-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
index 59f2fa79ad42..3106ac50827c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_pc.c
@@ -911,6 +911,7 @@ static bool pc_needs_min_freq_change(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
{
int ret;
+ u32 min_freq;
lockdep_assert_held(&pc->freq_lock);
@@ -933,8 +934,13 @@ static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
* Same thing happens for Server platforms where min is listed as
* RPMax
*/
- if (pc_get_min_freq(pc) > pc->rp0_freq)
+ min_freq = pc_get_min_freq(pc);
+ if (min_freq > pc->rp0_freq) {
ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, pc->rp0_freq);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+ min_freq = pc->rp0_freq;
+ }
/*
* Setting GT RP min frequency to 1.2GHz by default for
@@ -947,8 +953,8 @@ static int pc_adjust_freq_bounds(struct xe_guc_pc *pc)
* we aren't expecting high power output across board
*
*/
- if (pc_needs_min_freq_change(pc))
- ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, max(BMG_MIN_FREQ, pc_get_min_freq(pc)));
+ if (pc_needs_min_freq_change(pc) && min_freq < BMG_MIN_FREQ)
+ ret = pc_set_min_freq(pc, BMG_MIN_FREQ);
out:
return ret;
--
2.38.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 23:22 Vinay Belgaumkar [this message]
2026-08-04 23:34 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Fix a bug in pc_adjust_freq_bounds() (rev2) Patchwork
2026-08-05 0:17 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-05 5:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-05 20:37 ` [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Fix a bug in pc_adjust_freq_bounds() Summers, Stuart
2026-08-05 21:42 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804232218.1736159-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
--to=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
--cc=balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.