From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Simon Schippers" <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v14 1/5] tun/tap: add IFF_BACKPRESSURE flag
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:57:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805015734.9D6D31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803183641.96882-2-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] UAPI Bit Collision between IFF_NO_PI and IFF_NOFILTER causes silent failure to re-attach socket filters.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH net-next v14 1/5] tun/tap: add IFF_BACKPRESSURE flag ---
commit a863b69cf20b684debe10f1f06a9f4273abcd009
Author: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
tun/tap: add IFF_BACKPRESSURE flag
This commit adds the IFF_BACKPRESSURE flag to the TUN/TAP UAPI headers.
The flag acts as an opt-in switch for qdisc backpressure logic.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h
> index 79d53c7a1ebdc..a0ddc50a75342 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
> #define IFF_NAPI_FRAGS 0x0020
> /* Used in TUNSETIFF to bring up tun/tap without carrier */
> #define IFF_NO_CARRIER 0x0040
> +/* Stop the queue instead of dropping when the internal ring is full, so an
> + * attached qdisc applies backpressure instead of being bypassed.
> + */
> +#define IFF_BACKPRESSURE 0x0080
> #define IFF_NO_PI 0x1000
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed that IFF_NO_PI shares the same bit
value (0x1000) as IFF_NOFILTER in this header.
Does this bit collision cause a silent failure when re-attaching socket filters
on persistent TUN/TAP devices?
When userspace creates a persistent device and sets IFF_NO_PI, and later
re-attaches to it via TUNSETIFF, tun_set_iff() in drivers/net/tun.c evaluates
the flags:
err = tun_attach(tun, file, ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_NOFILTER,
ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_NAPI,
ifr->ifr_flags & IFF_NAPI_FRAGS, true);
Since ifr_flags & IFF_NOFILTER matches IFF_NO_PI (0x1000), it seems this would
pass skip_filter = true to tun_attach(), silently bypassing the BPF filters.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803183641.96882-1-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 18:36 [PATCH net-next v14 0/5] tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Simon Schippers
2026-08-03 18:36 ` [PATCH net-next v14 1/5] tun/tap: add IFF_BACKPRESSURE flag Simon Schippers
2026-08-05 1:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 18:36 ` [PATCH net-next v14 2/5] tun/tap: add ptr_ring consume helper with netdev queue wakeup Simon Schippers
2026-08-05 1:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:36 ` [PATCH net-next v14 3/5] vhost-net: wake queue of tun/tap after ptr_ring consume Simon Schippers
2026-08-03 18:36 ` [PATCH net-next v14 4/5] ptr_ring: move free-space check into separate helper Simon Schippers
2026-08-05 1:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:36 ` [PATCH net-next v14 5/5] tun/tap & vhost-net: stop tail-drop when IFF_BACKPRESSURE is set Simon Schippers
2026-08-05 5:20 ` [PATCH net-next v14 0/5] tun/tap & vhost-net: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Simon Schippers
2026-08-08 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805015734.9D6D31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.