[merged mm-stable] mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm: add MM_CP_UFFD_RWP change_protection() flag
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Subject: mm: add MM_CP_UFFD_RWP change_protection() flag
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:14:07 +0100

Preparatory patch.  Add the change_protection() primitive that userfaultfd
RWP will use.

An RWP-protected PTE is PAGE_NONE with the uffd PTE bit set.  The
PROT_NONE half makes the CPU fault on any access; the uffd bit
distinguishes an RWP fault from a plain mprotect(PROT_NONE) or NUMA
hinting fault.  MM_CP_UFFD_WP and MM_CP_UFFD_RWP share the same PTE bit,
so the two cannot be used together on the same range.

Two new change_protection() flags:

  MM_CP_UFFD_RWP            install PAGE_NONE and set the uffd bit
  MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_RESOLVE    restore vma->vm_page_prot, clear the uffd bit

Both are wired through change_pte_range(), change_huge_pmd(), and
hugetlb_change_protection() so anon, shmem, THP, and hugetlb all share the
same semantics.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260708111417.173443-7-kirill@shutemov.name
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/mm.h            |    5 +++
 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h |    1 
 mm/huge_memory.c              |   36 +++++++++++++-----------
 mm/hugetlb.c                  |   25 ++++++++++++----
 mm/mprotect.c                 |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/mm.h~mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag
+++ a/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -3340,6 +3340,11 @@ int get_cmdline(struct task_struct *task
 #define  MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE             (1UL << 3) /* Resolve wp */
 #define  MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL                 (MM_CP_UFFD_WP | \
 					    MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE)
+/* Whether this change is for uffd RWP */
+#define  MM_CP_UFFD_RWP                    (1UL << 4) /* do rwp */
+#define  MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_RESOLVE            (1UL << 5) /* resolve rwp */
+#define  MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_ALL                (MM_CP_UFFD_RWP | \
+					    MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_RESOLVE)
 
 bool can_change_pte_writable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 			     pte_t pte);
--- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h~mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag
+++ a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
@@ -369,7 +369,6 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_pmd_
 	return false;
 }
 
-
 static inline bool userfaultfd_armed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
 	return false;
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag
+++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2553,8 +2553,8 @@ bool move_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct
 }
 
 static void change_non_present_huge_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
-		unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmd, bool uffd_wp,
-		bool uffd_wp_resolve)
+		unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmd, bool uffd_prot,
+		bool uffd_prot_resolve)
 {
 	softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pmd(*pmd);
 	pmd_t newpmd;
@@ -2583,9 +2583,9 @@ static void change_non_present_huge_pmd(
 		newpmd = *pmd;
 	}
 
-	if (uffd_wp)
+	if (uffd_prot)
 		newpmd = pmd_swp_mkuffd(newpmd);
-	else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+	else if (uffd_prot_resolve)
 		newpmd = pmd_swp_clear_uffd(newpmd);
 	if (!pmd_same(*pmd, newpmd))
 		set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmd, newpmd);
@@ -2606,8 +2606,9 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *t
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	pmd_t oldpmd, entry;
 	bool prot_numa = cp_flags & MM_CP_PROT_NUMA;
-	bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
-	bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE;
+	bool uffd_prot = cp_flags & (MM_CP_UFFD_WP | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP);
+	bool uffd_prot_resolve = cp_flags &
+		(MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_RESOLVE);
 	int ret = 1;
 
 	tlb_change_page_size(tlb, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
@@ -2620,11 +2621,17 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *t
 		return 0;
 
 	if (thp_migration_supported() && pmd_is_valid_softleaf(*pmd)) {
-		change_non_present_huge_pmd(mm, addr, pmd, uffd_wp,
-					    uffd_wp_resolve);
+		change_non_present_huge_pmd(mm, addr, pmd, uffd_prot,
+					    uffd_prot_resolve);
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
+	/* Already in the desired state */
+	if (prot_numa && pmd_protnone(*pmd))
+		goto unlock;
+	if ((cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_RWP) && pmd_protnone(*pmd) && pmd_uffd(*pmd))
+		goto unlock;
+
 	if (prot_numa) {
 
 		/*
@@ -2635,9 +2642,6 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *t
 		if (is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
 			goto unlock;
 
-		if (pmd_protnone(*pmd))
-			goto unlock;
-
 		if (!folio_can_map_prot_numa(pmd_folio(*pmd), vma,
 					     vma_is_single_threaded_private(vma)))
 			goto unlock;
@@ -2666,9 +2670,9 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *t
 	oldpmd = pmdp_invalidate_ad(vma, addr, pmd);
 
 	entry = pmd_modify(oldpmd, newprot);
-	if (uffd_wp)
+	if (uffd_prot)
 		entry = pmd_mkuffd(entry);
-	else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+	else if (uffd_prot_resolve)
 		/*
 		 * Leave the write bit to be handled by PF interrupt
 		 * handler, then things like COW could be properly
@@ -2714,10 +2718,10 @@ int change_huge_pud(struct mmu_gather *t
 		return 1;
 
 	/*
-	 * Huge entries on userfault-wp only works with anonymous, while we
-	 * don't have anonymous PUDs yet.
+	 * Huge entries on userfault-wp or userfault-rwp only work with
+	 * anonymous, while we don't have anonymous PUDs yet.
 	 */
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL))
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cp_flags & (MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_ALL)))
 		return 1;
 
 	ptl = __pud_trans_huge_lock(pudp, vma);
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6427,6 +6427,8 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm
 	unsigned long last_addr_mask;
 	bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
 	bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE;
+	bool uffd_rwp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_RWP;
+	bool uffd_rwp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_RESOLVE;
 	struct mmu_gather tlb;
 
 	/*
@@ -6452,6 +6454,11 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm
 
 		ptep = hugetlb_walk(vma, address, psize);
 		if (!ptep) {
+			/*
+			 * uffd_wp installs a pte marker on the unpopulated
+			 * entry; uffd_rwp does not install markers so the
+			 * allocation is unnecessary for it.
+			 */
 			if (!uffd_wp) {
 				address |= last_addr_mask;
 				continue;
@@ -6473,7 +6480,8 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm
 			 * shouldn't happen at all.  Warn about it if it
 			 * happened due to some reason.
 			 */
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(uffd_wp || uffd_wp_resolve);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(uffd_wp || uffd_wp_resolve ||
+				     uffd_rwp || uffd_rwp_resolve);
 			pages++;
 			spin_unlock(ptl);
 			address |= last_addr_mask;
@@ -6507,9 +6515,9 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm
 				pages++;
 			}
 
-			if (uffd_wp)
+			if (uffd_wp || uffd_rwp)
 				newpte = pte_swp_mkuffd(newpte);
-			else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+			else if (uffd_wp_resolve || uffd_rwp_resolve)
 				newpte = pte_swp_clear_uffd(newpte);
 			if (!pte_same(pte, newpte))
 				set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, newpte, psize);
@@ -6520,19 +6528,24 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm
 			 * pte_marker_uffd_wp()==true implies !poison
 			 * because they're mutual exclusive.
 			 */
-			if (pte_is_uffd_wp_marker(pte) && uffd_wp_resolve)
+			if (pte_is_uffd_wp_marker(pte) &&
+			    (uffd_wp_resolve || uffd_rwp_resolve))
 				/* Safe to modify directly (non-present->none). */
 				huge_pte_clear(mm, address, ptep, psize);
 		} else {
 			pte_t old_pte;
 			unsigned int shift = huge_page_shift(hstate_vma(vma));
 
+			/* Already protnone with uffd bit set? Nothing to do. */
+			if (uffd_rwp && pte_protnone(pte) && huge_pte_uffd(pte))
+				goto next;
+
 			old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, address, ptep);
 			pte = huge_pte_modify(old_pte, newprot);
 			pte = arch_make_huge_pte(pte, shift, vma->vm_flags);
-			if (uffd_wp)
+			if (uffd_wp || uffd_rwp)
 				pte = huge_pte_mkuffd(pte);
-			else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+			else if (uffd_wp_resolve || uffd_rwp_resolve)
 				pte = huge_pte_clear_uffd(pte);
 			huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, address, ptep, old_pte, pte);
 			pages++;
--- a/mm/mprotect.c~mm-add-mm_cp_uffd_rwp-change_protection-flag
+++ a/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -214,8 +214,9 @@ static __always_inline void set_write_pr
 static long change_softleaf_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	unsigned long addr, pte_t *pte, pte_t oldpte, unsigned long cp_flags)
 {
-	const bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
-	const bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE;
+	const bool uffd_prot = cp_flags & (MM_CP_UFFD_WP | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP);
+	const bool uffd_prot_resolve = cp_flags &
+		(MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_RESOLVE);
 	softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pte(oldpte);
 	pte_t newpte;
 
@@ -256,7 +257,7 @@ static long change_softleaf_pte(struct v
 		 * to unprotect it, drop it; the next page
 		 * fault will trigger without uffd trapping.
 		 */
-		if (uffd_wp_resolve) {
+		if (uffd_prot_resolve) {
 			pte_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte);
 			return 1;
 		}
@@ -265,9 +266,9 @@ static long change_softleaf_pte(struct v
 		newpte = oldpte;
 	}
 
-	if (uffd_wp)
+	if (uffd_prot)
 		newpte = pte_swp_mkuffd(newpte);
-	else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+	else if (uffd_prot_resolve)
 		newpte = pte_swp_clear_uffd(newpte);
 
 	if (!pte_same(oldpte, newpte)) {
@@ -282,16 +283,17 @@ static __always_inline void change_prese
 		int nr_ptes, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot,
 		struct folio *folio, struct page *page, unsigned long cp_flags)
 {
-	const bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE;
-	const bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
+	const bool uffd_prot = cp_flags & (MM_CP_UFFD_WP | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP);
+	const bool uffd_prot_resolve = cp_flags &
+		(MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_RESOLVE);
 	pte_t ptent, oldpte;
 
 	oldpte = modify_prot_start_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, nr_ptes);
 	ptent = pte_modify(oldpte, newprot);
 
-	if (uffd_wp)
+	if (uffd_prot)
 		ptent = pte_mkuffd(ptent);
-	else if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+	else if (uffd_prot_resolve)
 		ptent = pte_clear_uffd(ptent);
 
 	/*
@@ -325,6 +327,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_
 	long pages = 0;
 	bool is_private_single_threaded;
 	bool prot_numa = cp_flags & MM_CP_PROT_NUMA;
+	bool uffd_rwp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_RWP;
 	bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
 	int nr_ptes;
 
@@ -350,6 +353,14 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_
 			/* Already in the desired state. */
 			if (prot_numa && pte_protnone(oldpte))
 				continue;
+			/*
+			 * RWP-protected PTEs carry _PAGE_UFFD as a marker on
+			 * top of PROT_NONE. Skip only entries already in that
+			 * exact state; plain PROT_NONE from mprotect() still needs
+			 * to be promoted so future faults can be distinguished.
+			 */
+			if (uffd_rwp && pte_protnone(oldpte) && pte_uffd(oldpte))
+				continue;
 
 			page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, oldpte);
 			if (page)
@@ -358,6 +369,8 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_
 			/*
 			 * Avoid trapping faults against the zero or KSM
 			 * pages. See similar comment in change_huge_pmd.
+			 * Skip this filter for uffd RWP which
+			 * must set protnone regardless of NUMA placement.
 			 */
 			if (prot_numa &&
 			    !folio_can_map_prot_numa(folio, vma,
@@ -428,7 +441,7 @@ pgtable_split_needed(struct vm_area_stru
 	 * (e.g. 2M shmem) because file thp is handled differently when
 	 * split by erasing the pmd so far.
 	 */
-	return (cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP) && !vma_is_anonymous(vma);
+	return (cp_flags & (MM_CP_UFFD_WP | MM_CP_UFFD_RWP)) && !vma_is_anonymous(vma);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -667,7 +680,16 @@ long change_protection(struct mmu_gather
 	pgprot_t newprot = vma->vm_page_prot;
 	long pages;
 
-	BUG_ON((cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL) == MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL);
+	/*
+	 * MM_CP_UFFD_{WP,RWP} and _RESOLVE are mutually exclusive within one
+	 * change, and WP and RWP cannot mix. Miswired callers get a warn and
+	 * a no-op; userspace cannot reach this state.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE((cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL) == MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL ||
+			 (cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_ALL) == MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_ALL ||
+			 ((cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL) &&
+			  (cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_RWP_ALL))))
+		return 0;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
 	/*
@@ -681,6 +703,10 @@ long change_protection(struct mmu_gather
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(cp_flags & MM_CP_PROT_NUMA);
 #endif
 
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_PROTNONE) &&
+	    (cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_RWP))
+		newprot = PAGE_NONE;
+
 	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
 		pages = hugetlb_change_protection(vma, start, end, newprot,
 						  cp_flags);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from kas@kernel.org are

selftests-mm-add-pagemap_scan-test-for-thp-pmd-holes.patch
mm-huge_memory-remove-unused-can_split_folio.patch
mm-huge_memory-fold-split_folio_to_list_to_order-into-split_folio_to_order.patch
mm-fold-userfaultfd_rwp-to-false-without-config_arch_has_pte_protnone.patch