From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: vladimir.murzin@arm.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
ruanjinjie@huawei.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
maz@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:37:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805093710.3c4baf6c@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804170503.3513916-2-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 18:04:44 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> The arm64 implementation of this_cpu_write() casts 'val' to unsigned
> long. This is necessary to handle cases where 'val' is a pointer type,
> and to avoid spurious compiler warnings for the (unreachable!) cases
> where the pointer type would be cast to a smaller integer type.
>
> Unfortunately, the cast is applied to 'val' rather than '(val)', which
> won't always generate the expected value when 'val' is an expression.
>
> For example, for this_cpu_write(pcp, zero - 1), where 'pcp' is a u64 and
> 'zero' is a u32:
>
> * 'zero' ===> (u32) 0x00000000
> * 'zero - 1' ===> (u32) 0xffffffff
> * '(unsigned long)zero - 1' ===> (u64) 0xffffffffffffffff
> * '(unsigned long)(zero - 1)' ===> (u64) 0x00000000ffffffff
>
> Fix this by adding brackets around 'val'
>
> The bug described above can be seen from the disassembly of the
> following test code:
>
> | void this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1(u64 __percpu *pcp)
> | {
> | u32 zero = 0;
> | this_cpu_write(*pcp, zero - 1);
> | }
> |
> | void this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1_brackets(u64 __percpu *pcp)
> | {
> | u32 zero = 0;
> | this_cpu_write(*pcp, (zero - 1));
> | }
>
> Generated code before this patch:
>
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1>:
> | paciasp
> | stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> | mrs x1, sp_el0
> | mov x29, sp
> | ldr w2, [x1, #8]
> | add w2, w2, #0x1
> | str w2, [x1, #8]
> | mov x3, #0xffffffffffffffff
> | mrs x2, tpidr_el1
> | str x3, [x0, x2]
> | ldr x0, [x1, #8]
> | add x0, x0, x3
> | str w0, [x1, #8]
> | cbz x0, 1f
> | ldr x0, [x1, #8]
> | cbnz x0, 2f
> | 1: bl preempt_schedule_notrace
> | 2: ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
> | autiasp
> | ret
> |
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1_brackets>:
> | paciasp
> | stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> | mrs x1, sp_el0
> | mov x29, sp
> | ldr w2, [x1, #8]
> | add w2, w2, #0x1
> | str w2, [x1, #8]
> | mov x3, #0xffffffff
> | mrs x2, tpidr_el1
> | str x3, [x0, x2]
> | ldr x0, [x1, #8]
> | sub x0, x0, #0x1
> | str w0, [x1, #8]
> | cbz x0, 1f
> | ldr x0, [x1, #8]
> | cbnz x0, 2f
> | 1: bl preempt_schedule_notrace
> | 2: ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
> | autiasp
> | ret
>
> Generated code after this patch:
>
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1>:
> | paciasp
> | stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> | mrs x1, sp_el0
> | mov x29, sp
> | ldr w2, [x1, #8]
> | add w2, w2, #0x1
> | str w2, [x1, #8]
> | mov x3, #0xffffffff
> | mrs x2, tpidr_el1
> | str x3, [x0, x2]
> | ldr x0, [x1, #8]
> | sub x0, x0, #0x1
> | str w0, [x1, #8]
> | cbz x0, 1f
> | ldr x0, [x1, #8]
> | cbnz x0, 2f
> | 1: bl preempt_schedule_notrace
> | 2: ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
> | autiasp
> | ret
> |
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1_brackets>:
> | b this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1
>
> Fixes: 959bf2fd03b5 ("arm64: percpu: Rewrite per-cpu ops to allow use of LSE atomics")
> Reported-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
I suspect there is no affected code - largely testable by comparing the
output of two arm64 allmodconfig builds.
Reviewed-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> index b57b2bb009677..63bbfd4944a37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -179,13 +179,13 @@ PERCPU_RET_OP(add, add, ldadd)
> _pcp_protect_return(__percpu_read_64, pcp)
>
> #define this_cpu_write_1(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_8, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> + _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_8, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> #define this_cpu_write_2(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_16, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> + _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_16, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> #define this_cpu_write_4(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_32, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> + _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_32, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> #define this_cpu_write_8(pcp, val) \
> - _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_64, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> + _pcp_protect(__percpu_write_64, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
>
> #define this_cpu_add_1(pcp, val) \
> _pcp_protect(__percpu_add_case_8, pcp, val)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 17:04 [PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 8:37 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-08-07 4:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:14 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 13:02 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 8:28 ` David Laight
2026-08-06 10:23 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-07 9:52 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-08-07 11:35 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 22:45 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05 10:27 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 12:50 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05 6:45 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-05 6:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 11:21 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 12:02 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 13:25 ` David Laight
2026-08-06 13:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-08-05 12:08 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805093710.3c4baf6c@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.