All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sriram Nambakam <snambakam@linux.microsoft.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 37/42] KVM: selftests: run plane tests with a split IRQ chip
Date: Wed,  5 Aug 2026 04:03:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805110324.25067-38-snambakam@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805110324.25067-1-snambakam@linux.microsoft.com>

Wire the plane selftests to actually exercise planes instead of skipping:

- Add vm_create_barebones_irqchip() and create the test VMs with a split
  IRQ chip, which planes require, and query KVM_CAP_PLANES on the VM fd
  (system scope always returns 1).
- Switch plane vCPU creation to KVM_CREATE_VCPU with the vCPU id, matching
  the current plane ABI, and drop the removed KVM_CREATE_VCPU_PLANE,
  KVM_CAP_PLANES_FPU and req_exit_planes paths from the tests and docs.
- Rename x86/plane_test.c to x86/plane_x86_test.c.
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm      |   2 +-
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h  |  12 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c    |   8 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/plane_test.c      |  20 ++--
 .../x86/{plane_test.c => plane_x86_test.c}    | 109 +++---------------
 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/{plane_test.c => plane_x86_test.c} (58%)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index 80933e942ecf..750350e187c8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/nested_tdp_fault_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/nested_tsc_adjust_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/nested_tsc_scaling_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/nested_vmsave_vmload_test
-TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/plane_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/plane_x86_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/platform_info_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/pmu_counters_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/pmu_event_filter_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
index 2ea2960f1e2d..c4726fc7b065 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
@@ -1070,6 +1070,18 @@ static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create_barebones(void)
 	return ____vm_create(VM_SHAPE_DEFAULT);
 }
 
+static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create_barebones_irqchip(bool split)
+{
+	struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_barebones();
+
+	if (split)
+		vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP, 24);
+	else
+		vm_create_irqchip(vm);
+
+	return vm;
+}
+
 static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create_barebones_type(unsigned long type)
 {
 	const struct vm_shape shape = {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
index 43a23634b4f4..ce53230b23d0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
@@ -790,10 +790,8 @@ static void vm_vcpu_rm(struct kvm_vm *vm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 void kvm_vm_release(struct kvm_vm *vmp)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, *tmp_vcpu;
-	struct kvm_plane_vcpu *plane_vcpu, *tmp_plane_vcpu;
-	struct kvm_plane *plane, *tmp_plane;
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(vcpu, tmp, &vmp->vcpus, list)
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(vcpu, tmp_vcpu, &vmp->vcpus, list)
 		vm_vcpu_rm(vmp, vcpu);
 
 	kvm_free_fd(vmp->fd);
@@ -1366,8 +1364,8 @@ struct kvm_plane_vcpu *__vm_plane_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_pla
 	plane_vcpu = calloc(1, sizeof(*plane_vcpu));
 	TEST_ASSERT(plane_vcpu != NULL, "Insufficient Memory");
 
-	plane_vcpu->fd = __plane_ioctl(plane, KVM_CREATE_VCPU_PLANE, (void *)(unsigned long)vcpu->fd);
-	TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(plane_vcpu->fd >= 0, KVM_CREATE_VCPU_PLANE, plane_vcpu->fd, plane->vm);
+	plane_vcpu->fd = __plane_ioctl(plane, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)(unsigned long)vcpu->id);
+	TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(plane_vcpu->fd >= 0, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, plane_vcpu->fd, plane->vm);
 	plane_vcpu->id = vcpu->id;
 	plane_vcpu->plane0 = vcpu;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/plane_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/plane_test.c
index 9cf3ab76b3cd..fd09d1f78ebe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/plane_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/plane_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ void test_create_plane_errors(int max_planes)
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	int planefd, plane_vcpufd;
 
-	vm = vm_create_barebones();
+	/* Planes require an in-kernel (split) IRQ chip. */
+	vm = vm_create_barebones_irqchip(true);
 	vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
 
 	planefd = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_CREATE_PLANE, (void *)(unsigned long)0);
@@ -34,9 +35,9 @@ void test_create_plane_errors(int max_planes)
 		    "Creating plane %d, expecting EINVAL. ret: %d, errno: %d",
 		    max_planes, planefd, errno);
 
-	plane_vcpufd = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_CREATE_VCPU_PLANE, (void *)(unsigned long)vcpu->fd);
-	TEST_ASSERT(plane_vcpufd == -1 && errno == ENOTTY,
-		    "Creating vCPU for plane 0, expecting ENOTTY. ret: %d, errno: %d",
+	plane_vcpufd = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)(unsigned long)vcpu->id);
+	TEST_ASSERT(plane_vcpufd == -1 && errno == EEXIST,
+		    "Creating existing vCPU for plane 0, expecting EEXIST. ret: %d, errno: %d",
 		    plane_vcpufd, errno);
 
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ void test_create_plane(void)
 	struct kvm_plane *plane;
 	int r;
 
-	vm = vm_create_barebones();
+	vm = vm_create_barebones_irqchip(true);
 	vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
 
 	plane = vm_plane_add(vm, 1);
@@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ void test_create_plane(void)
 
 	__vm_plane_vcpu_add(vcpu, plane);
 
-	r = __plane_ioctl(plane, KVM_CREATE_VCPU_PLANE, (void *)(unsigned long)vcpu->fd);
+	r = __plane_ioctl(plane, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)(unsigned long)vcpu->id);
 	TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == EEXIST,
 		    "Creating vCPU again for plane 1. ret: %d, errno: %d",
 		    r, errno);
@@ -86,7 +87,10 @@ void test_create_plane(void)
 
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
-	int cap_planes = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_PLANES);
+	struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_barebones_irqchip(true);
+	int cap_planes = vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_PLANES);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 	TEST_REQUIRE(cap_planes);
 
 	ksft_print_header();
@@ -98,6 +102,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	if (cap_planes > 1)
 		test_create_plane();
+	else
+		ksft_test_result_skip("plane creation requires KVM_CAP_PLANES > 1\n");
 
 	ksft_finished();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/plane_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/plane_x86_test.c
similarity index 58%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/plane_test.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/plane_x86_test.c
index 0fdd8a066723..8f0919371383 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/plane_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/plane_x86_test.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  * Test for x86-specific VM plane functionality
  */
 #include <fcntl.h>
+#include <limits.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
@@ -26,7 +27,7 @@ static void test_plane_regs(void)
 
 	struct kvm_regs regs0, regs1;
 
-	vm = vm_create_barebones();
+	vm = vm_create_barebones_irqchip(true);
 	vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
 	plane = vm_plane_add(vm, 1);
 	plane_vcpu = __vm_plane_vcpu_add(vcpu, plane);
@@ -62,8 +63,7 @@ static void test_plane_fpu_nonshared(void)
 
 	struct kvm_xsave xsave0, xsave1;
 
-	vm = vm_create_barebones();
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_PLANES_FPU), false);
+	vm = vm_create_barebones_irqchip(true);
 
 	vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
 	vcpu_init_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
@@ -93,79 +93,15 @@ static void test_plane_fpu_nonshared(void)
 	ksft_test_result_pass("get/set FPU not shared across planes\n");
 }
 
-static void test_plane_fpu_shared(void)
-{
-	struct kvm_vm *vm;
-	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
-	struct kvm_plane *plane;
-	struct kvm_plane_vcpu *plane_vcpu;
-
-	struct kvm_xsave xsave0, xsave1;
-
-	vm = vm_create_barebones();
-	vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_PLANES_FPU, 1ul);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_PLANES_FPU), true);
-
-	vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
-	vcpu_init_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
-	vcpu_set_cpuid(vcpu);
-
-	plane = vm_plane_add(vm, 1);
-	plane_vcpu = __vm_plane_vcpu_add(vcpu, plane);
-
-	vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_GET_XSAVE, &xsave0);
-
-	xsave0.region[XSTATE_BV_OFFSET] |= XFEATURE_MASK_FP | XFEATURE_MASK_SSE;
-	xsave0.region[XMM_OFFSET] = 0x12345678;
-	vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_XSAVE, &xsave0);
-	plane_vcpu_ioctl(plane_vcpu, KVM_GET_XSAVE, &xsave1);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(xsave1.region[XMM_OFFSET], 0x12345678);
-
-	xsave1.region[XSTATE_BV_OFFSET] |= XFEATURE_MASK_FP | XFEATURE_MASK_SSE;
-	xsave1.region[XMM_OFFSET] = 0x87654321;
-	plane_vcpu_ioctl(plane_vcpu, KVM_SET_XSAVE, &xsave1);
-	vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_GET_XSAVE, &xsave0);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(xsave0.region[XMM_OFFSET], 0x87654321);
-
-	ksft_test_result_pass("get/set FPU shared across planes\n");
-
-	if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PKU)) {
-		ksft_test_result_skip("get/set PKRU with shared FPU\n");
-		goto exit;
-	}
-
-	xsave0.region[XSTATE_BV_OFFSET] = XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU;
-	xsave0.region[PKRU_OFFSET] = 0xffffffff;
-	vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_XSAVE, &xsave0);
-	plane_vcpu_ioctl(plane_vcpu, KVM_GET_XSAVE, &xsave0);
-
-	xsave0.region[XSTATE_BV_OFFSET] = XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU;
-	xsave0.region[PKRU_OFFSET] = 0xaaaaaaaa;
-	vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_XSAVE, &xsave0);
-	plane_vcpu_ioctl(plane_vcpu, KVM_GET_XSAVE, &xsave1);
-	assert(xsave1.region[PKRU_OFFSET] == 0xffffffff);
-
-	xsave1.region[XSTATE_BV_OFFSET] = XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU;
-	xsave1.region[PKRU_OFFSET] = 0x55555555;
-	plane_vcpu_ioctl(plane_vcpu, KVM_SET_XSAVE, &xsave1);
-	vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_GET_XSAVE, &xsave0);
-	assert(xsave0.region[PKRU_OFFSET] == 0xaaaaaaaa);
-
-	ksft_test_result_pass("get/set PKRU with shared FPU\n");
-
-exit:
-	kvm_vm_free(vm);
-}
-
 #define APIC_SPIV		0xF0
 #define APIC_IRR		0x200
 
 #define MYVEC			192
 
-#define MAKE_MSI(cpu, vector) ((struct kvm_msi){		\
-	.address_lo = APIC_DEFAULT_GPA + (((cpu) & 0xff) << 8),	\
-	.address_hi = (cpu) & ~0xff,				\
-	.data = (vector),					\
+#define MAKE_MSI(cpu, vector) ((struct kvm_msi){			\
+	.address_lo = APIC_DEFAULT_GPA + (((cpu) & 0xff) << 8),		\
+	.address_hi = (cpu) & ~0xff,					\
+	.data = (vector),						\
 })
 
 static bool has_irr(struct kvm_lapic_state *apic, int vector)
@@ -194,7 +130,7 @@ static void test_plane_msi(void)
 	struct kvm_msi msi = MAKE_MSI(0, MYVEC);
 	struct kvm_lapic_state lapic0, lapic1;
 
-	vm = __vm_create(VM_SHAPE_DEFAULT, 1, 0);
+	vm = vm_create_barebones_irqchip(true);
 
 	vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
 	vcpu_init_cpuid(vcpu, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
@@ -215,6 +151,7 @@ static void test_plane_msi(void)
 	do_enable_lapic(&lapic1);
 	plane_vcpu_ioctl(plane_vcpu, KVM_SET_LAPIC, &lapic1);
 
+	/* Deliver to plane 1 (via the plane fd); it must land only in plane 1. */
 	r = __plane_ioctl(plane, KVM_SIGNAL_MSI, &msi);
 	TEST_ASSERT(r == 1,
 		   "Delivering interrupt to plane 1. ret: %d, errno: %d", r, errno);
@@ -224,46 +161,32 @@ static void test_plane_msi(void)
 	plane_vcpu_ioctl(plane_vcpu, KVM_GET_LAPIC, &lapic1);
 	TEST_ASSERT(has_irr(&lapic1, MYVEC), "Vector set in plane 1");
 
-	/* req_exit_planes always has priority */
-	vcpu->run->req_exit_planes = (1 << 1);
-	vcpu_run(vcpu);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_PLANE_EVENT);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->plane_event.cause, KVM_PLANE_EVENT_INTERRUPT);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->plane_event.pending_event_planes, (1 << 1));
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->plane_event.target, (1 << 1));
-
+	/* Deliver to plane 0 (via the vm fd); it must land in plane 0. */
 	r = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SIGNAL_MSI, &msi);
 	TEST_ASSERT(r == 1,
 		   "Delivering interrupt to plane 0. ret: %d, errno: %d", r, errno);
 	vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_GET_LAPIC, &lapic0);
 	TEST_ASSERT(has_irr(&lapic0, MYVEC), "Vector set in plane 0");
 
-	/* req_exit_planes ignores current plane; current plane is cleared */
-	vcpu->run->plane = 1;
-	vcpu->run->req_exit_planes = (1 << 0) | (1 << 1);
-	vcpu_run(vcpu);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_PLANE_EVENT);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->plane_event.cause, KVM_PLANE_EVENT_INTERRUPT);
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->plane_event.pending_event_planes, (1 << 0));
-	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->plane_event.target, (1 << 0));
-
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
-	ksft_test_result_pass("signal MSI for planes\n");
+	ksft_test_result_pass("signal MSI routed per plane\n");
 }
 
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
-	int cap_planes = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_PLANES);
+	struct kvm_vm *vm = vm_create_barebones_irqchip(true);
+	int cap_planes = vm_check_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_PLANES);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 	TEST_REQUIRE(cap_planes && cap_planes > 1);
 
 	ksft_print_header();
-	ksft_set_plan(5);
+	ksft_set_plan(3);
 
 	pr_info("# KVM_CAP_PLANES: %d\n", cap_planes);
 
 	test_plane_regs();
 	test_plane_fpu_nonshared();
-	test_plane_fpu_shared();
 	test_plane_msi();
 
 	ksft_finished();
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05 11:02 [RFC PATCH v1 00/42] VBS/VSM-on-KVM: VBS integration for KVM VM planes Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/42] Fix merge issue - Remove duplicate definition for kvm_arch_has_irq_bypass Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/42] Fix compilation Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/42] Fix compile error Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/42] Fix compile errors Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/42] Initial support for VM Planes - Add kernel config for CONFIG_VM_PLANES - Parse vm plane config from initrd for plane configuration - Make hypercalls to allocate memory for the vm planes Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/42] Use vcpu count from the plane configuration Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/42] skip processing plane configuration for plane 0 - plane 0 is the boot plane Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/42] Add plane config param to specify kernel image format Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/42] Activate the VM Planes through the Hypervisor - Using KVM as the VMM Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/42] allow the command line to be specified for kernels in other planes Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/42] Various changes to support VM Planes Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/42] Add a Virtualization Based Security (VBS) framework. - Add backends for AMD SEV-SNP, Intel TDX, Arm CCA and KVM Planes. - Support VTL on Hyper-V in addition to Planes on KVM Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/42] Add a inter-plane communication mechanism through KVM. - model this to use a single page similar to SEV-SNP Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/42] KVM: Add per-plane memory attribute support for cross-plane EPT protection Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/42] KVM: x86: Add KVM_HC_VBS_VTL_CALL hypercall for VBS inter-plane calls Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/42] vbs: Add HEKI kernel sealing and fix KVM plane memory attribute guards Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/42] vbs: Add module authentication via VBS/HEKI Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/42] vbs: Add kexec validation and make module auth non-fatal Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/42] Merge branch 'master' into vm-planes Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/42] kvm: x86: fix merged plane API/stat build regressions Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/42] KVM: x86: exit VM planes and VBS hypercalls to userspace Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/42] kexec: block legacy kexec_load when VBS is active Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/42] kvm: x86: fix merged plane API/stat build regressions Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/42] KVM: planes: expose memory-attribute setting to in-kernel callers Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/42] vm_planes: drop unused per-plane vcpu_count Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 26/42] drivers/virt: add VBS secure-plane park loop Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 27/42] KVM: planes: add arch-neutral in-kernel plane switch helper Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 28/42] KVM: x86: add VBS VTL call/return and cross-plane set-mem-attrs hypercalls Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 29/42] init/vm_planes: set up planes from rootfs_initcall and load ELF payloads Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 30/42] security/vbs: run backend probe and HEKI seal at rootfs_initcall Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 31/42] security/vbs: pin the VTL call hypercall to CPU0 Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 32/42] security/vbs: add secure-plane monitor backend Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 33/42] drivers/virt: rename VBS park loop to secure_monitor Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 34/42] x86/realmode: skip the sub-1M trampoline for the VBS secure plane Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 35/42] KVM: x86: deny normal-plane access to secure-plane memory Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 36/42] KVM: plane: handle KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION on the plane fd Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` Sriram Nambakam [this message]
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 38/42] kvm: x86: drop obsolete kvm_cache_regs.h Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 39/42] kvm: arch: finalize plane hooks and kvm_arch_vcpu_create signature Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 40/42] kvm: x86: use kvm_vcpu scheduling-state accessors and struct stat fields Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 41/42] kvm: x86: finalize per-plane APIC state and CPUID placement Sriram Nambakam
2026-08-05 11:03 ` [RFC PATCH v1 42/42] kvm: planes: reconcile core plane state, UAPI and hypercall exit Sriram Nambakam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260805110324.25067-38-snambakam@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=snambakam@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.