From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:35:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805143542.536E31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805133013.235016-9-acme@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Error returns in `jit_process_dump` loop are ignored, causing subsequent records to consume stale metadata from failed parses.
- [Medium] `jit_inject` ignores the return value of `jit_process_dump` entirely, falsely reporting success on complete processing failures.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks ---
commit 57747ce97971858edaaa984c164ff79271eb0779
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks
This commit fixes memory leaks in perf jitdump by ensuring previous allocations
for debug_data and unwinding_data are freed before reassignment. It also adds
cleanup of both buffers when closing the jitdump session.
Fixes: 9b07e27f88b9 ("perf inject: Add jitdump mmap injection support")
Reported-by: sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> index 4f52b143cd0da..3085091b95a51 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -706,6 +708,7 @@ static int jit_repipe_debug_info(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr)
>
> memcpy(data, &jr->info.entries, sz);
>
> + zfree(&jd->debug_data);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the error handling in
jit_repipe_debug_info() leave stale data active if a subsequent parse fails?
If malloc() fails or the payload size is malformed earlier in the function, it
returns -1 without clearing jd->debug_data. Does jit_process_dump() check this
error code, or does it continue and allow the next JIT_CODE_LOAD record to
consume the uncleared, stale debug data from a prior successful record?
tools/perf/util/jitdump.c:jit_process_dump() {
...
case JIT_CODE_DEBUG_INFO:
ret = jit_repipe_debug_info(jd, jr);
break;
...
}
> jd->debug_data = data;
>
> /*
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it intentional that jit_inject() ignores
the return value of jit_process_dump() on complete failure?
If a fatal parsing or allocation error propagates out to ret, it looks like
the error code is logged in verbose mode but ultimately discarded from the
caller:
tools/perf/util/jitdump.c:jit_inject() {
...
ret = jit_process_dump(jd);
jit_close(jd);
if (verbose > 0)
fprintf(stderr, "injected: %s (%d)\n", path, ret);
return 0;
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260805133013.235016-1-acme@kernel.org?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 13:29 [PATCHES v1 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf jitdump: Fix extended header read that always fails Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 18:51 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf jitdump: Validate code_size against total_size in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 18:58 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf jitdump: Prevent integer underflow in debug info size calculation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 18:59 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf jitdump: Bounds-check debug entry byte-swap loop Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:00 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf jitdump: Check snprintf return before computing header size Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:07 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 19:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:29 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-07 12:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf jitdump: Fix funlockfile on unlocked stream in jit_open() error path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 15:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:09 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf jitdump: Free event in jit_repipe_code_move() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:09 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-05 19:10 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf jitdump: Use dirname() return value in jit_open() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:16 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf jitdump: Validate debug entries on native (non-swap) path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 19:19 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf jitdump: Validate sym string NUL-termination in code load Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:19 ` Ian Rogers
2026-08-05 13:30 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 19:20 ` Ian Rogers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-05 21:26 [PATCHES v2 0/12] perf jitdump: Input validation hardening Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-08-05 21:26 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf jitdump: Fix debug_data and unwinding_data leaks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805143542.536E31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.