All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
To: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Cc: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Chinmay Rath <rathc@linux.ibm.com>,
	Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] target/ppc/kvm: Use host compatibility mode for nested guests
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 20:03:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805195553.784a407c-48-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bce28234-2d74-8a2d-d21f-ff1844147441@eik.bme.hu>

Hi BALATON,

Thanks for reviewing this patch. Please find my response inline below.

On 2026/08/04 09:55 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2026, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > On POWER systems, the host CPU may run in a compatibility mode (e.g.,
> > a Power11 processor operating in Power10 compatibility mode). When
> > running nested KVM guests, QEMU currently derives the host CPU type
> > using mfpvr(), which reflects the physical processor version. This can
> > result in a mismatch between the CPU model used by QEMU and the
> > compatibility mode enforced by the host, leading to guest boot failures
> > such as "KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements".
> > 
> > Update kvm_ppc_get_host_cpu_class() to check if the host is running in
> > a compatibility mode using kvm_ppc_host_compat_pvr(). When available,
> > use the compatibility PVR instead of the raw hardware PVR when selecting
> > the CPU model. This ensures that QEMU selects a CPU model consistent
> > with the host compatibility mode, allowing nested guests to boot
> > correctly.
> > 
> > The guard uses #if defined(TARGET_PPC64) to prevent build breakage on
> > ppc32 targets where the POWER9/10/11 PVR constants are not defined.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > No changes in this version.
> > 
> > target/ppc/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > index d4c5601a00c4..aa8269186a1a 100644
> > --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > @@ -2682,6 +2682,18 @@ PowerPCCPUClass *kvm_ppc_get_host_cpu_class(void)
> >     uint32_t host_pvr = mfpvr();
> >     PowerPCCPUClass *pvr_pcc;
> > 
> > +#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_KVM
> > +#error "CONFIG_KVM is not enabled"
> > +#endif
> 
> In meson.build:
> 
> ppc_system_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_KVM', if_true: files('kvm.c'))
> 
> so I think this check and #error does not make sense.

You're right that kvm.c is always compiled with CONFIG_KVM enabled due
to the meson.build constraint, so the #ifndef CONFIG_KVM / #error check
can never fire. I added it as an explicit compile-time assertion to
document the assumption, but it is redundant given the build system
already enforces it. I'll drop it in the next version.

Thanks,
Amit

> 
> Regards,
> BALATON Zoltan
> 
> > +    uint32_t compat_host_pvr;
> > +
> > +    compat_host_pvr = kvm_ppc_host_compat_pvr();
> > +    if (compat_host_pvr) {
> > +        host_pvr = compat_host_pvr;
> > +    }
> > +#endif /* TARGET_PPC64 */
> > +
> >     pvr_pcc = ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr(host_pvr);
> >     if (pvr_pcc == NULL) {
> >         pvr_pcc = ppc_cpu_class_by_pvr_mask(host_pvr);
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 18:29 [PATCH v5 0/3] ppc/kvm: Handle CPU compatibility mode correctly for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 18:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] [DO_NOT_MERGE] linux-headers: Add uapi header changes Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 18:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] target/ppc/kvm: Add support for querying host compatibility mode Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 18:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] target/ppc/kvm: Use host compatibility mode for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-08-04 19:55   ` BALATON Zoltan
2026-08-05 14:33     ` Amit Machhiwal [this message]
2026-08-05  8:25 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ppc/kvm: Handle CPU compatibility mode correctly " Anushree Mathur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260805195553.784a407c-48-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
    --cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=milesg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rathc@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.