From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: evon.chiam@altera.com
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: altera: agilex72: add clock manager support
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:40:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806094039.3BE071F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <394c5838c535f939361da220ad94c9aec7fea973.1786006669.git.evon.chiam@altera.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Clock gate operations (.enable, .disable, .is_enabled) are missing from gateclk_ops, rendering clock gating non-functional.
- [High] Probe error path leaves non-devm clocks registered with CCF while their backing MMIO regions are unmapped, leading to a use-after-free panic.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: altera: agilex72: add clock manager support ---
commit 9ede61d9f11826e0bfb7cdf0bab36155fec8e509
Author: Chiam, Evon <evon.chiam@altera.com>
arm64: dts: altera: agilex72: add clock manager support
Add the Agilex72 clock manager node and input reference clocks, and
wire the UART clocks through the clock manager instead of a fixed
clock. Set the SoCDK board-specific input clock frequencies.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex72.c b/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex72.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..e350d8a9bb4d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex72.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1181 @@
[ ... ]
> +static const struct clk_ops peri_cnt_clk_ops = {
> + .recalc_rate = agilex72_clk_peri_cnt_clk_recalc_rate,
> + .get_parent = agilex72_clk_periclk_get_parent,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops gateclk_ops = {
> + .recalc_rate = agilex72_gate_clk_recalc_rate,
> + .get_parent = agilex72_gate_get_parent,
> +};
[Severity: High]
Since gateclk_ops omits the standard clock gating callbacks like .enable,
.disable, and .is_enabled, won't this prevent the kernel from toggling hardware
gates?
If a peripheral's clock was disabled by the bootloader, calling
clk_prepare_enable() from a driver will silently return success without
modifying the hardware. Subsequent register accesses to that peripheral could
trigger a synchronous external abort.
[ ... ]
> + init.ops = &gateclk_ops;
> +
> + init.name = clks->name;
> + init.flags = 0;
> + init.num_parents = clks->num_parents;
> + init.parent_names = clks->parent_names;
> + socfpga_clk->hw.hw.init = &init;
> +
> + hw_clk = &socfpga_clk->hw.hw;
> +
> + ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &socfpga_clk->hw.hw);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(socfpga_clk);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> + return hw_clk;
> +}
[Severity: High]
Individual clocks are registered into the Common Clock Framework using
clk_hw_register() here without being tied to the device's devres lifecycle.
If devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor() fails later during
agilex72_clkmgr_init(), the probe will abort and the devres framework will
automatically unmap the MMIO bases.
However, these non-devm clocks registered earlier will not be unregistered.
Could this leave dangling pointers in the CCF?
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * usb31_ref_clk is a 1:1 alias of usb31_suspend_clk. The DWC3
> + * controller uses the same source for both its suspend and reference
> + * clock inputs on this SoC. Register it as a fixed-factor (passthrough)
> + * clock so that enabling it propagates to the parent gate without
> + * touching any gate register of its own.
> + */
> + clk_data->clk_data.hws[AGILEX72_USB31_REF_CLK] =
> + devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(dev, "usb31_ref_clk",
> + "usb31_suspend_clk", 0, 1, 1);
> + if (IS_ERR(clk_data->clk_data.hws[AGILEX72_USB31_REF_CLK]))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev,
> + PTR_ERR(clk_data->clk_data.hws[AGILEX72_USB31_REF_CLK]),
> + "failed to register clock usb31_ref_clk\n");
[Severity: High]
This error path fails the probe without unregistering the previously registered
non-devm clocks.
If CCF later walks the clock tree (e.g., via a read of
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary), it will invoke the .recalc_rate callbacks
of these leaked clocks. Those callbacks will dereference the now-unmapped memory
pointers, causing an external abort/kernel panic.
Is there a way to unregister them to avoid leaving dangling pointers, or should
devm_clk_hw_register() be used for all clocks?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1786006669.git.evon.chiam@altera.com?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 9:25 [PATCH 0/5] clk: socfpga: add Agilex72 clock manager support evon.chiam
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: altera: fix Agilex72 compatible vendor prefix evon.chiam
2026-08-06 9:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 2:49 ` Rob Herring
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: altr,agilex72-clkmgr: add Agilex72 clock manager binding evon.chiam
2026-08-06 9:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] clk: socfpga: agilex72: add clock manager driver for Agilex72 evon.chiam
2026-08-06 9:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 17:42 ` Brian Masney
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: altera: move Agilex72 DT and use altr prefix evon.chiam
2026-08-06 9:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: altera: agilex72: add clock manager support evon.chiam
2026-08-06 9:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806094039.3BE071F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=evon.chiam@altera.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.