From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] perf/core: Clear the whole branch entry in perf_clear_branch_entry()
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 06:52:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806135224.3267890-4-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806135224.3267890-1-puranjay@kernel.org>
perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() clears the bitfields of struct
perf_branch_entry one by one and leaves from/to alone, since callers
overwrite those straight away. The list has to be kept in sync with the
struct by hand and has already fallen behind: new_type and priv were
added to perf_branch_entry and never added here.
Only BRBE writes those two, and neither is written for every record.
brbe_set_perf_entry_type() leaves new_type alone for a branch type it
does not recognise, and priv is not set for source-only records.
arm_pmuv3.c allocates the per-CPU branch stack with kmalloc(), so such a
record carries whatever the slot held: uninitialised kmalloc() data on
the first pass over the buffer, the previous record's values after that.
Both reach userspace through the branch stack. Nothing under
arch/x86/events/ writes either field, so x86 is unaffected.
Clear the entry with a single struct assignment instead:
*br = (struct perf_branch_entry){ };
The bitfields add up to exactly 64 bits, so there is no padding, and
every caller assigns from/to immediately afterwards, so zeroing those as
well changes nothing. PERF_BR_SPEC_NA is 0, so dropping the explicit
spec assignment leaves the behaviour unchanged. Nothing needs keeping in
sync when a field is added.
The helper no longer touches only bitfields, so rename it to
perf_clear_branch_entry().
Fixes: b190bc4ac9e6 ("perf: Extend branch type classification")
Fixes: 5402d25aa571 ("perf: Capture branch privilege information")
Suggested-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 6 +++---
drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c | 2 +-
include/linux/perf_event.h | 16 ++--------------
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c
index 06f35a6b58a5b..68c5f42965e91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/brs.c
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ void amd_brs_drain(void)
rdmsrq(brs_from(brs_idx), from);
- perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br+nr);
+ perf_clear_branch_entry(br + nr);
br[nr].from = from;
br[nr].to = to;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
index 5b437dc8e4ce2..3639817456119 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/lbr.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ void amd_pmu_lbr_read(void)
entry.to.split.reserved)
continue;
- perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br + out);
+ perf_clear_branch_entry(br + out);
br[out].from = sign_ext_branch_ip(entry.from.split.ip);
br[out].to = sign_ext_branch_ip(entry.to.split.ip);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index f8fadb0b16a45..6541c7046c2b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
rdmsrq(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, msr_lastbranch.lbr);
- perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br);
+ perf_clear_branch_entry(br);
br->from = msr_lastbranch.from;
br->to = msr_lastbranch.to;
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
if (abort && x86_pmu.lbr_double_abort && out > 0)
out--;
- perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br+out);
+ perf_clear_branch_entry(br + out);
br[out].from = from;
br[out].to = to;
br[out].mispred = mis;
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
to = rdlbr_to(i, lbr);
info = rdlbr_info(i, lbr);
- perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(e);
+ perf_clear_branch_entry(e);
e->from = from;
e->to = to;
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
index ba554e0c846c4..effbdeacfcbb3 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static bool perf_entry_from_brbe_regset(int index, struct perf_branch_entry *ent
return false;
brbinf = bregs.brbinf;
- perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(entry);
+ perf_clear_branch_entry(entry);
if (brbe_record_is_complete(brbinf)) {
entry->from = bregs.brbsrc;
entry->to = bregs.brbtgt;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 48d851fbd8ea5..e034be4a473a8 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1467,21 +1467,9 @@ static inline u32 perf_sample_data_size(struct perf_sample_data *data,
return size;
}
-/*
- * Clear all bitfields in the perf_branch_entry.
- * The to and from fields are not cleared because they are
- * systematically modified by caller.
- */
-static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(struct perf_branch_entry *br)
+static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry(struct perf_branch_entry *br)
{
- br->mispred = 0;
- br->predicted = 0;
- br->in_tx = 0;
- br->abort = 0;
- br->cycles = 0;
- br->type = 0;
- br->spec = PERF_BR_SPEC_NA;
- br->reserved = 0;
+ *br = (struct perf_branch_entry){ };
}
extern void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 13:52 [PATCH v6 0/3] perf/core: sched_task() dispatch and branch entry fixes Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/core: Fix NULL pmu_ctx passed to pmu->sched_task() Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-07 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-07 14:15 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-06 13:52 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] perf/core: Run sched_task() for PMUs with only CPU-wide events Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-07 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-07 15:13 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-06 13:52 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2026-08-07 10:29 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] perf/core: Clear the whole branch entry in perf_clear_branch_entry() Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-07 14:32 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-07 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] perf/core: sched_task() dispatch and branch entry fixes James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806135224.3267890-4-puranjay@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.