From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/ap: Drop unused member from ap_device_id
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:07:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806160713.C864D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806155757.1281233-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The commit message incorrectly references `device_info` instead of `driver_info`.
- [Low] The `kernel_ulong_t` typedef is no longer used after the removal of `driver_info`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1] s390/ap: Drop unused member from ap_device_id ---
commit 88f5caa72995cfeb3eb825fd5c1c4f333ad8e5d7
Author: Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
s390/ap: Drop unused member from ap_device_id
This commit removes the driver_info member from the ap_device_id structure.
The structure is not part of the API/ABI and the member has no in-kernel
users.
> ap_device_id::device_info is not used in the kernel. The structure is
> also not part of API/ABI, so the unused member can just be dropped.
[Severity: Medium]
This isn't a bug in the code, but the commit message references device_info.
The struct member actually being removed by this patch is named driver_info.
> diff --git a/include/linux/device-id/ap.h b/include/linux/device-id/ap.h
> index 0992333a34db2..011af33c0bcf2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device-id/ap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device-id/ap.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ typedef unsigned long kernel_ulong_t;
[Severity: Low]
Does this change leave behind an unused typedef?
With the removal of driver_info, it appears the kernel_ulong_t typedef and
its enclosing #ifdef __KERNEL__ block are no longer used anywhere in this
header file.
> struct ap_device_id {
> __u16 match_flags; /* which fields to match against */
> __u8 dev_type; /* device type */
> - kernel_ulong_t driver_info;
> };
>
> #endif /* ifndef LINUX_DEVICE_ID_AP_H */
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806155757.1281233-2-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 15:57 [PATCH v1] s390/ap: Drop unused member from ap_device_id Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-08-06 16:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 16:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-08-06 16:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 8:40 ` Holger Dengler
2026-08-23 21:23 ` Vasily Gorbik
2026-08-13 14:55 ` [PATCH v1] " Harald Freudenberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806160713.C864D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.