From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.alien8.de (mail.alien8.de [65.109.113.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7FE1388E63; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.109.113.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786040216; cv=none; b=k0zlbetgiFsBNuthuHQ8ADqlksEGJGwoqj98k3csN9SSNDOvjW3e9BR/92N1vrYDSA6iKlz0ey2q44jfuirnRnHFUAm2PagvpuBbxAINnDvyRQmiOf0ALmannpYNVrCucO3pvZLcVI5H9sAWyq8G+qjO7J0BYCiEUOFaEZjc+Zo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786040216; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aPF/k3s+EvGi16bkCOhvHq17FIM4H7LGLmjhshm52qc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gHajR5Ev7Mrli2S/2Rj9je+8vIksdd6g7+/M+una3rUamSLqmtNwDxitKtiauExOKKW6cPurtc7WjACYkCwV08I+C30Qg3n1pROf0+nM0bNkkZrrpvXQ8hFpMIRmpuWSOv3q8lLpKOwUHltQL3UFBqc7H7f/lTqyH/x1a/VhtpQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b=FjWknaRH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.109.113.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="FjWknaRH" Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alien8.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTP id E8EC540E016E; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:16:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.alien8.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de Received: from mail.alien8.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bHR8h4PQ0myC; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:16:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=alien8; t=1786040205; bh=eivCTlL1pgz/6ZVPyC5W8SfS79f8rUG9D92yKZ9Y9/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FjWknaRH+8Mi2NsGYhf2Ot0oYT4IJHZ4SDtvG9KGZXNG0qWOrHrl0wPaU7SDL+nri rM8E0I9NrE8/QpcF0yWn2u85vUYF1Xw4pUzBRECHp7ejTFa4Jo8KfKwBS+6TZOp5ag o8z2rE1sKE2edUBmd3aTwZwSOnnPF8nJs9EjwCme1S/J2zFDwNvsyoP3VUmNVcBb3j 67Ovhq7J+fbrz18ZtjauIKASuxRzEM4jR3Fz7pkqCN9xbIcw9TCUuybFKKPKc8vpIF X5ZYaqE3fZ0btG0EOqbTgc1sKFxVF4hEpdLrVUxUfz+db9gcnTheiFpDch5OpsZDVy mado5PyVjlOjtImGrpkaA1hB6lxbqF8zsQ8ETWD16XB5tJcHb/+Tvbh92Lz82hSB4Q 3VPuKS+dIWgcs8bIhluG6xL/uwRdnePbei6VAFBeiAX7eEgc+uQgX8uURrGerJH87l SUhZzL2zPT0ow+CVyO4F76cxomsKKmxK6j7Ia6RoxFxlUWz8tB+TMUqcCxDsXuAHXj JGBSKs+VNmJ/684/i0cMrk+IrrVCICMu4plNdVta5Jhp9B82FWoxfzZtnLp9KP9Qck n5PyCApxCsio7NFSyHR/4s3Ijeed6kqR4CrdXL2/doLe4c4J/rJlByEPDFrv76mIjI T6T47ZFA+mXVap2806HhJfsM= Received: by mail.alien8.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k, from userid 1005) id 3ED1940E01CE; Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 18:16:45 +0000 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dinh Nguyen Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, rounakdas2025@gmail.com, niravkumar.l.rabara@altera.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] EDAC/altera: Guard against NULL of_node Message-ID: <20260806181645.GCanTPjVMp9VY1EPnX@fat_crate.local> References: <20260806161055.1520446-1-dinguyen@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260806161055.1520446-1-dinguyen@kernel.org> On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 11:10:54AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > Hi EDAC maintainers, > > I wanted to explain the reason why I think this patch doesn't need a > Fixes tag. The way the Altera EDAC is written there are many instances > of the driver referencing the of_node, which is why they are flagged in > many sashiko reviews. If you think this patch would make your life easier, then sure. But we're not "fixing" the code just because a tool is stupid. No matter which tool it is. Thx.