All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Liew Rui Yan" <aethernet65535@gmail.com>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon: skip deactivated schemes in watermark checks and add fallback sleep
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:47:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807094731.9122F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807093526.183009-3-aethernet65535@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kdamond_wait_activation() traps kdamond in an infinite sleep loop when no schemes are registered, completely breaking pure access monitoring.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon: skip deactivated schemes in watermark checks and add fallback sleep ---
commit 7f4aa250c9a91aca4f1a7a02df1c14e1ab990d4e
Author: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>

mm/damon: skip deactivated schemes in watermark checks and add fallback sleep

This commit modifies scheme evaluation to skip those deactivated either by
watermarks or max_nr_snapshots. It also changes kdamond_wait_activation()
to sleep for the sample interval as a fallback when all schemes are
deactivated.

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -3704,16 +3711,23 @@ static int kdamond_wait_activation(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
>  
>  	while (!kdamond_need_stop(ctx)) {
>  		damon_for_each_scheme(s, ctx) {
> +			if (s->max_nr_snapshots &&
> +				s->max_nr_snapshots <= s->stat.nr_snapshots)
> +				continue;
> +
>  			wait_time = damos_wmark_wait_us(s);
>  			if (!init_wait_time || wait_time < min_wait_time) {
>  				init_wait_time = true;
>  				min_wait_time = wait_time;
>  			}
>  		}
> -		if (!min_wait_time)
> +		if (!min_wait_time && init_wait_time)
>  			return 0;
>  
> -		kdamond_usleep(min_wait_time);
> +		if (min_wait_time)
> +			kdamond_usleep(min_wait_time);
> +		else
> +			kdamond_usleep(ctx->attrs.sample_interval);

[Severity: High]
Does this change cause a regression where kdamond becomes trapped in an
infinite sleep loop if no schemes are configured?

When a user starts DAMON for pure access monitoring without configuring any
schemes, the damon_for_each_scheme() loop is bypassed. This leaves
init_wait_time as false.

Because init_wait_time is false, the condition
if (!min_wait_time && init_wait_time) will fail. The function then falls
through to the new fallback logic:

    kdamond_usleep(ctx->attrs.sample_interval);

Since init_wait_time remains false on every iteration of the while loop,
kdamond_wait_activation() will never return 0. Could this permanently hang
the monitoring thread and prevent it from collecting any access metrics?

>  
>  		kdamond_call(ctx, false);
>  		if (ctx->maybe_corrupted)

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807093526.183009-1-aethernet65535@gmail.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07  9:35 [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm/damon: fix nr_snapshots semantics and max_nr_snapshots check coverage Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-07  9:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/damon: fix nr_snapshots counting using tried_applied flag Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-07  9:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:52   ` SJ Park
2026-08-07  9:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon: skip deactivated schemes in watermark checks and add fallback sleep Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-07  9:47   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 14:07   ` SJ Park
2026-08-07 16:18     ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-08  0:07       ` SJ Park
2026-08-08 21:55     ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-08 22:50       ` SJ Park
2026-08-07 14:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] mm/damon: fix nr_snapshots semantics and max_nr_snapshots check coverage SJ Park
2026-08-07 16:19   ` Liew Rui Yan
2026-08-07 23:59     ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807094731.9122F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=aethernet65535@gmail.com \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.