All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:50:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807155051.528FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178611682030.237811.16459191503595231339.stgit@devnote2>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr updates the hardware and shadow registers but fails to update the perf_event's canonical software state, leading to silent hardware reverts and incorrect event samples.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API ---
commit bbc277e839d1fd31bb4bfa9d695721e5b6899bf6
Author: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>

x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API
    
Wprobe needs to move an active per-CPU watchpoint without releasing and
reserving its hardware slot.
    
Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() to find the installed local
slot and update only its address shadow and hardware debug address
register. Publish the shadow first so hw_breakpoint_restore() observes
the new address if an NMI interrupts the update.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/59637b96946653393a7ad3c7de094094796b39c2.1785067572.git.wangjinchao600@gmail.com/

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 9ef24b55737f8..c89f6e71c3a91 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -128,6 +128,39 @@ int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr(struct perf_event *bp,
> +					  unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw;
> +	struct perf_event_attr attr = bp->attr;
> +	unsigned int seq;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> +	attr.bp_addr = addr;
> +	ret = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, &attr, &hw);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

[Severity: High]
Does this discard the validated software state?

The new address configuration is successfully validated into the local 'hw'
struct, but neither the architecture-specific state (counter_arch_bp(bp))
nor the core attribute (bp->attr.bp_addr) are updated.

If the breakpoint is later re-installed (e.g., during CPU offline/online or
PMU scheduling), arch_install_hw_breakpoint() will read the stale address:

    struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
    ...
    this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], info->address);
    barrier();
    set_debugreg(info->address, i);

Could this silently revert the hardware register back to the old address?

Also, if a watchpoint fires, perf_bp_event() initializes the sample record
using the unmodified bp->attr.bp_addr. Could this result in reporting
incorrect addresses in the trace output?

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < HBP_NUM; i++) {
> +		if (this_cpu_read(bp_per_reg[i]) == bp)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (WARN_ONCE(i == HBP_NUM, "Can't find any breakpoint slot"))
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	do {
> +		seq = this_cpu_inc_return(cpu_dr7_seq);
> +		this_cpu_write(cpu_debugreg[i], addr);
> +		barrier();
> +		set_debugreg(addr, i);
> +	} while (seq != this_cpu_read(cpu_dr7_seq));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/178611679753.237811.10190793347982785419.stgit@devnote2?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07 15:33 [PATCH v12 00/11] tracing: wprobe: x86: Add wprobe for watchpoint Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Make DR7 updates NMI safe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 16:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] x86/hw_breakpoints: Add arch_modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] HWBP: Add modify_local_hw_breakpoint_addr() API Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] tracing/wprobe: Add wprobe (watchpoint probe) trace event support Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] x86: hw_breakpoint: Add a kconfig to clarify when a breakpoint fires Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] selftests: tracing: Add a basic testcase for wprobe Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] selftests: tracing: Add syntax " Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] tracing/wprobe: Add set_wprobe and clear_wprobe event triggers Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:34 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] selftests: ftrace: Add wprobe trigger testcase Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 15:35 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF typecast in fetchargs Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:35 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] tracing/wprobe: Support BTF struct offset resolution in set_wprobe trigger Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2026-08-07 15:59   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807155051.528FB1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.